Scholarlink

<p>Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into medical education and assessment. However, their performance in high-stakes, non-English medical licensing examinations—particularly within culturally distinct medical systems such as Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM)—remains insufficiently evaluated. This study aimed to systematically compare the performance of Gemini 3 Pro, DeepSeek V3.1, and GPT-5.2 in the Chinese National Traditional Chinese Medicine Licensing Examination (TCMLE) over two consecutive years (2023 and 2024), and to assess their potential implications for TCM education. All original examination questions from the 2023 and 2024 TCMLE (600 questions per year), encompassing all official question types and examination units, were independently input into each model in Chinese. Model responses were evaluated based on accuracy. Comparative analyses across models, question types, and examination units were conducted using chi-square tests, with statistical significance set at <i>P</i> &lt; .05. DeepSeek V3.1 demonstrated significantly higher overall accuracy than Gemini 3 Pro and GPT-5.2 in both 2023 (87.1%) and 2024 (86.7%) (<i>P</i> &lt; .001 for all comparisons). Gemini 3 Pro exhibited moderate and relatively stable performance across both years, whereas GPT-5.2 achieved the lowest overall accuracy despite a modest improvement from 2023 to 2024. Notably, DeepSeek V3.1 showed particular strength in structured and clinically oriented question formats and in foundational knowledge units. Linguistic and cultural alignment plays a critical role in LLM performance on specialized medical licensing examinations. Locally optimized models such as DeepSeek V3.1 may serve as valuable auxiliary tools in TCM education, particularly for examination preparation and knowledge reinforcement, although careful human oversight remains essential.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Three large language models demonstrate competitive performance in Traditional Chinese Medicine national medical licensing examinations over two years

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月17日

查看全文
  • Chenghan Du,
  • Yien Pan,
  • Cheoklong Ng,
  • Yingjie Ding,
  • Jiahua Pan,
  • Wei Xue,
  • Xiaoying Yao,
  • Jiwei Huang

摘要

Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly integrated into medical education and assessment. However, their performance in high-stakes, non-English medical licensing examinations—particularly within culturally distinct medical systems such as Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM)—remains insufficiently evaluated. This study aimed to systematically compare the performance of Gemini 3 Pro, DeepSeek V3.1, and GPT-5.2 in the Chinese National Traditional Chinese Medicine Licensing Examination (TCMLE) over two consecutive years (2023 and 2024), and to assess their potential implications for TCM education. All original examination questions from the 2023 and 2024 TCMLE (600 questions per year), encompassing all official question types and examination units, were independently input into each model in Chinese. Model responses were evaluated based on accuracy. Comparative analyses across models, question types, and examination units were conducted using chi-square tests, with statistical significance set at P < .05. DeepSeek V3.1 demonstrated significantly higher overall accuracy than Gemini 3 Pro and GPT-5.2 in both 2023 (87.1%) and 2024 (86.7%) (P < .001 for all comparisons). Gemini 3 Pro exhibited moderate and relatively stable performance across both years, whereas GPT-5.2 achieved the lowest overall accuracy despite a modest improvement from 2023 to 2024. Notably, DeepSeek V3.1 showed particular strength in structured and clinically oriented question formats and in foundational knowledge units. Linguistic and cultural alignment plays a critical role in LLM performance on specialized medical licensing examinations. Locally optimized models such as DeepSeek V3.1 may serve as valuable auxiliary tools in TCM education, particularly for examination preparation and knowledge reinforcement, although careful human oversight remains essential.