Scholarlink

<p>Low-complexity regions (LCRs) are compositionally biased segments of proteins that play critical roles in molecular recognition, structural flexibility, and phase separation. Yet, their accurate detection remains challenging due to methodological variability among computational tools. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive benchmarking of eight widely used LCR detection methods (under multiple parameter settings) across the <i>Homo sapiens</i> proteome. A modular computational framework was developed to systematically compare LCR characteristics, including residue-centric analyses such as length distribution and coverage percentage. Protein-centric analyses included compositional bias, amino acid composition, and Shannon entropy. Consensus analyses revealed that regions detected by multiple tools were typically longer, more repetitive, and compositionally purer, suggesting stronger structural or functional relevance. Jaccard similarity matrices revealed distinct clustering patterns among algorithms based on shared detection principles. Additionally, entropy and purity analyses highlighted fundamental differences in sequence complexity captured by each tool. Together, these results provide a unified, reproducible framework for evaluating LCR detection performance and offer practical guidelines for reliable annotation of low-complexity regions in proteome-scale studies.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A benchmarking framework for comparative evaluation of low-complexity region detection tools in the human proteome

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月15日

查看全文
  • Anirjit Chatterjee,
  • Nagarjun Vijay

摘要

Low-complexity regions (LCRs) are compositionally biased segments of proteins that play critical roles in molecular recognition, structural flexibility, and phase separation. Yet, their accurate detection remains challenging due to methodological variability among computational tools. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive benchmarking of eight widely used LCR detection methods (under multiple parameter settings) across the Homo sapiens proteome. A modular computational framework was developed to systematically compare LCR characteristics, including residue-centric analyses such as length distribution and coverage percentage. Protein-centric analyses included compositional bias, amino acid composition, and Shannon entropy. Consensus analyses revealed that regions detected by multiple tools were typically longer, more repetitive, and compositionally purer, suggesting stronger structural or functional relevance. Jaccard similarity matrices revealed distinct clustering patterns among algorithms based on shared detection principles. Additionally, entropy and purity analyses highlighted fundamental differences in sequence complexity captured by each tool. Together, these results provide a unified, reproducible framework for evaluating LCR detection performance and offer practical guidelines for reliable annotation of low-complexity regions in proteome-scale studies.