Scholarlink

<p>This study proposes a probabilistic hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for assessing sustainable heating system alternatives under uncertain situations. The selection of heating systems is a major issue in sustainability in cold climate regions due to its high energy requirements. The proposed approach integrates the Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (PHF-AHP) for determining the weights of decision criteria and the Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) for ranking alternatives. The probabilistic hesitant fuzzy approach allows decision-makers to reflect uncertainty and hesitation in decision-making under expert judgments by considering various membership values with their respective probabilities. To validate the proposed methodological framework, a case study of five heating system alternatives is presented. The results reveal that the proposed PHF-AHP-EDAS approach is reliable in ranking alternatives under ambiguity and uncertainty in sustainability decision problems.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A hybrid decision-support framework for selecting sustainable domestic heating systems in cold climates

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年4月11日

查看全文
  • Krishnan Suvitha,
  • Veeramuthu Murugesan,
  • Ramasamy Jaisankar,
  • Samayan Narayanamoorthy,
  • Naif Almakayeel,
  • Hasan Dincer,
  • Serhat Yuksel,
  • Jeonghwan Jeon

摘要

This study proposes a probabilistic hesitant fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making approach for assessing sustainable heating system alternatives under uncertain situations. The selection of heating systems is a major issue in sustainability in cold climate regions due to its high energy requirements. The proposed approach integrates the Probabilistic Hesitant Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (PHF-AHP) for determining the weights of decision criteria and the Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS) for ranking alternatives. The probabilistic hesitant fuzzy approach allows decision-makers to reflect uncertainty and hesitation in decision-making under expert judgments by considering various membership values with their respective probabilities. To validate the proposed methodological framework, a case study of five heating system alternatives is presented. The results reveal that the proposed PHF-AHP-EDAS approach is reliable in ranking alternatives under ambiguity and uncertainty in sustainability decision problems.