Scholarlink

<p>Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) have been shown to modulate neural activity, yet their specific effects on memory, particularly the distinction between working memory and short-term recall, remain unresolved. This study examined whether patterned EMF exposure influences these domains, using the WAIS-IV Digit Span Forward (DSF) and Digit Span Backward (DSB) subtests. Ninety-eight healthy volunteers were randomly assigned, in a between-subjects design, to one of four conditions: Theta-Burst (five-pulse bursts at 100&#xa0;Hz), Theta-Gamma (mimicking theta–gamma coupling in hippocampal networks), 40&#xa0;Hz gamma stimulation, or sham stimulation. Fields were applied for 30&#xa0;min in one of three spatial configurations: unilaterally over the left hemisphere, unilaterally over the right hemisphere, or bilaterally over the temporal lobes. Theta-Burst EMF reduced working memory performance on the DSB task and was accompanied by increased high-alpha (10–12&#xa0;Hz) activity in the left inferior frontal gyrus and a whole-brain effect centered on the right superior frontal gyrus. In contrast, Theta-Gamma EMF reduced DSF performance without detectable EEG changes. These findings indicate that EMF effects on memory are frequency- and pattern-specific, selectively altering behavior and, in some cases, underlying neural activity. Optimizing stimulation parameters may allow such fields to be harnessed for cognitive enhancement or targeted neuromodulation.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Electromagnetic field stimulation modulates working memory and cortical alpha oscillations in healthy adults

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月26日

查看全文
  • Kate S. Branigan,
  • Kevin S. Saroka,
  • Paula L. Corradini,
  • Michel A. Larivière,
  • Blake T. Dotta

摘要

Electromagnetic fields (EMFs) have been shown to modulate neural activity, yet their specific effects on memory, particularly the distinction between working memory and short-term recall, remain unresolved. This study examined whether patterned EMF exposure influences these domains, using the WAIS-IV Digit Span Forward (DSF) and Digit Span Backward (DSB) subtests. Ninety-eight healthy volunteers were randomly assigned, in a between-subjects design, to one of four conditions: Theta-Burst (five-pulse bursts at 100 Hz), Theta-Gamma (mimicking theta–gamma coupling in hippocampal networks), 40 Hz gamma stimulation, or sham stimulation. Fields were applied for 30 min in one of three spatial configurations: unilaterally over the left hemisphere, unilaterally over the right hemisphere, or bilaterally over the temporal lobes. Theta-Burst EMF reduced working memory performance on the DSB task and was accompanied by increased high-alpha (10–12 Hz) activity in the left inferior frontal gyrus and a whole-brain effect centered on the right superior frontal gyrus. In contrast, Theta-Gamma EMF reduced DSF performance without detectable EEG changes. These findings indicate that EMF effects on memory are frequency- and pattern-specific, selectively altering behavior and, in some cases, underlying neural activity. Optimizing stimulation parameters may allow such fields to be harnessed for cognitive enhancement or targeted neuromodulation.