Scholarlink

<p>Cranial fractures are widely documented in archaeological contexts, yet the application of fracture mechanics to differentiate traumatic events remains limited. This study analyses a dataset of 234 human cadavers subjected to 329 experimentally controlled blunt-impact tests, examining mechanical variables and fracture patterns that could be relevant to archaeological interpretation. The results show substantial methodological variability across the analysed studies. Analysis of these studies indicates that impact energy is the most reliable parameter for assessing fracture severity, suggesting a preliminary fracture threshold of around 2000&#xa0;N, and that bone thickness is a major determinant of cranial resistance. Clear differences in fracture morphology according to impact surface were also observed: focal surfaces frequently produce depressed and comminuted fractures, whereas broad surfaces predominantly generate linear fractures. These data provide a framework for archaeological analysis: bone thickness, fracture morphology, and the presence and distribution of secondary fractures offer indirect but informative proxies for impact energy and surface characteristics, which could help to distinguish violent from non-violent events. This study emphasizes the need for dynamic fracture-mechanics approaches and targeted experimental work to better characterise archaeological impacts.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Bioengineering approaches to dynamic impact analysis for cranial fracture interpretation in arcaheology

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年2月11日

查看全文
  • Daniel Rodríguez-Iglesias,
  • Ana Pantoja-Pérez,
  • Ángel De La Rosa,
  • Pedro Latorre-Carmona,
  • Nohemi Sala

摘要

Cranial fractures are widely documented in archaeological contexts, yet the application of fracture mechanics to differentiate traumatic events remains limited. This study analyses a dataset of 234 human cadavers subjected to 329 experimentally controlled blunt-impact tests, examining mechanical variables and fracture patterns that could be relevant to archaeological interpretation. The results show substantial methodological variability across the analysed studies. Analysis of these studies indicates that impact energy is the most reliable parameter for assessing fracture severity, suggesting a preliminary fracture threshold of around 2000 N, and that bone thickness is a major determinant of cranial resistance. Clear differences in fracture morphology according to impact surface were also observed: focal surfaces frequently produce depressed and comminuted fractures, whereas broad surfaces predominantly generate linear fractures. These data provide a framework for archaeological analysis: bone thickness, fracture morphology, and the presence and distribution of secondary fractures offer indirect but informative proxies for impact energy and surface characteristics, which could help to distinguish violent from non-violent events. This study emphasizes the need for dynamic fracture-mechanics approaches and targeted experimental work to better characterise archaeological impacts.