Scholarlink

<p>Monitoring cardiac output (CO) is helpful in the perioperative management of the patient with severe mitral regurgitation (MR). We assessed the accuracy and precision of the Cheetah CO monitor in patients with moderate or severe MR undergoing right and left heart catheterization as part of their pre-operative evaluation for mitral valve surgery. Cheetah CO was obtained concurrently with thermodilution CO (TD CO). Bias data was non-normally distributed; therefore, a non-parametric equivalent to Bland and Altman limits of agreement was used. Additionally, the proportions of differences between the experimental and reference method that were ≤ 0.5&#xa0;L/min, ≤ 1&#xa0;L/min, and &gt;1&#xa0;L/min were calculated. Twenty-seven subjects were enrolled and completed the study. The median difference between Cheetah and TD CO measurements was − 0.82&#xa0;L/min, and the 5th and 95th centiles were − 6.05&#xa0;L/min and 3.25&#xa0;L/min, respectively. Of all differences, 25.9%, 51.9%, and 48.1% were ≤ 0.5&#xa0;L/min, ≤ 1&#xa0;L/min, and &gt; 1&#xa0;L/min. No proportional bias was present. We conclude that the Cheetah CO measurements in patients with moderate to severe MR cannot be used interchangeably with TD CO due to a large bias and imprecision.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

A validation study comparing Cheetah monitor cardiac output to thermodilution cardiac output in patients with severe mitral regurgitation

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月27日

查看全文
  • Ludmil Mitrev,
  • Michael Rosenbloom,
  • Georges Kaddissi,
  • Ahmed Awad,
  • Janah Aji,
  • Jeffrey Ogbara,
  • Keyur Trivedi,
  • Noud van Helmond

摘要

Monitoring cardiac output (CO) is helpful in the perioperative management of the patient with severe mitral regurgitation (MR). We assessed the accuracy and precision of the Cheetah CO monitor in patients with moderate or severe MR undergoing right and left heart catheterization as part of their pre-operative evaluation for mitral valve surgery. Cheetah CO was obtained concurrently with thermodilution CO (TD CO). Bias data was non-normally distributed; therefore, a non-parametric equivalent to Bland and Altman limits of agreement was used. Additionally, the proportions of differences between the experimental and reference method that were ≤ 0.5 L/min, ≤ 1 L/min, and >1 L/min were calculated. Twenty-seven subjects were enrolled and completed the study. The median difference between Cheetah and TD CO measurements was − 0.82 L/min, and the 5th and 95th centiles were − 6.05 L/min and 3.25 L/min, respectively. Of all differences, 25.9%, 51.9%, and 48.1% were ≤ 0.5 L/min, ≤ 1 L/min, and > 1 L/min. No proportional bias was present. We conclude that the Cheetah CO measurements in patients with moderate to severe MR cannot be used interchangeably with TD CO due to a large bias and imprecision.