<p>Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a serious adverse effect of cisplatin (CDDP)- and carboplatin (CBDCA)-containing treatments. In this study, we aimed to assess the potential to predict CINV in subsequent CBDCA-containing chemotherapy based on symptoms induced by prior CDDP-containing treatments. Patients with thoracic cancer who received CDDP followed by CBDCA treatments (<i>n</i> = 52) were divided into a control group, including patients with total control (TC) of CINV during prior CDDP-containing treatment period, and a CINV-experience group, including patients who did not achieve TC of CINV during the CDDP-containing treatment period. Patients were retrospectively evaluated. The TC rates during all evaluation periods (0–120&#xa0;h) were significantly lower in the CINV-experience group than in the control group (45.5% and 86.7%, respectively, <i>P</i> = 0.002), which met the primary endpoint. The incidence rates of all-grade nausea and anorexia were also significantly higher in the CINV-experience group. In conclusion, our study suggests that CINV prediction in subsequent CBDCA-containing treatment based on the symptoms induced by prior CDDP-containing treatment is achievable.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Evaluating the potential to predict chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in carboplatin-containing treatment based on symptoms induced by prior cisplatin-containing treatment

  • Yoshitaka Saito,
  • Takuya Watanabe,
  • Yoh Takekuma,
  • Jun Sakakibara-Konishi,
  • Yasushi Shimizu,
  • Ichiro Kinoshita,
  • Mitsuru Sugawara

摘要

Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is a serious adverse effect of cisplatin (CDDP)- and carboplatin (CBDCA)-containing treatments. In this study, we aimed to assess the potential to predict CINV in subsequent CBDCA-containing chemotherapy based on symptoms induced by prior CDDP-containing treatments. Patients with thoracic cancer who received CDDP followed by CBDCA treatments (n = 52) were divided into a control group, including patients with total control (TC) of CINV during prior CDDP-containing treatment period, and a CINV-experience group, including patients who did not achieve TC of CINV during the CDDP-containing treatment period. Patients were retrospectively evaluated. The TC rates during all evaluation periods (0–120 h) were significantly lower in the CINV-experience group than in the control group (45.5% and 86.7%, respectively, P = 0.002), which met the primary endpoint. The incidence rates of all-grade nausea and anorexia were also significantly higher in the CINV-experience group. In conclusion, our study suggests that CINV prediction in subsequent CBDCA-containing treatment based on the symptoms induced by prior CDDP-containing treatment is achievable.