Scholarlink

<p>Ambient Interactive ZEST EX (AIZE-EX) is a newly developed, time-saving visual field (VF) test algorithm for follow-up assessments in glaucoma patients that utilizes prior AIZE results. This study compared VF test results between AIZE and AIZE-EX in patients with glaucoma. Ninety-two eyes from 46 glaucoma patients were examined. All underwent the AIZE test at baseline and both AIZE and AIZE-EX tests at follow-up. Two test patterns were employed: 24-2 (44 eyes) and 24plus(1-2) (48 eyes). Mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), mean sensitivity (MS), and test duration were compared between visits using the Mann–Whitney U test, and pointwise sensitivity differences were calculated. MD, PSD, and MS values obtained from AIZE-EX showed no significant differences compared with those from baseline and follow-up AIZE tests. Test duration for AIZE remained consistent between visits, whereas AIZE-EX reduced test time by approximately 10-30% (p&lt;0.001). AIZE-EX demonstrated comparable performance to AIZE in detecting glaucomatous VF abnormalities, while significantly reducing test duration. These findings suggest that AIZE-EX may serve as a preferred algorithm for follow-up VF examinations in glaucoma patients.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Evaluation of the visual field test algorithm: the Ambient Interactive ZEST-EX (AIZE-EX)

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月14日

查看全文
  • Hiroki Nomoto,
  • Chota Matsumoto,
  • Keiji Yoshikawa,
  • Mami Nanno,
  • Shinji Kimura,
  • Satoshi Inoue,
  • Kenzo Yamanaka,
  • Shunji Kusaka

摘要

Ambient Interactive ZEST EX (AIZE-EX) is a newly developed, time-saving visual field (VF) test algorithm for follow-up assessments in glaucoma patients that utilizes prior AIZE results. This study compared VF test results between AIZE and AIZE-EX in patients with glaucoma. Ninety-two eyes from 46 glaucoma patients were examined. All underwent the AIZE test at baseline and both AIZE and AIZE-EX tests at follow-up. Two test patterns were employed: 24-2 (44 eyes) and 24plus(1-2) (48 eyes). Mean deviation (MD), pattern standard deviation (PSD), mean sensitivity (MS), and test duration were compared between visits using the Mann–Whitney U test, and pointwise sensitivity differences were calculated. MD, PSD, and MS values obtained from AIZE-EX showed no significant differences compared with those from baseline and follow-up AIZE tests. Test duration for AIZE remained consistent between visits, whereas AIZE-EX reduced test time by approximately 10-30% (p<0.001). AIZE-EX demonstrated comparable performance to AIZE in detecting glaucomatous VF abnormalities, while significantly reducing test duration. These findings suggest that AIZE-EX may serve as a preferred algorithm for follow-up VF examinations in glaucoma patients.