Scholarlink

<p>We compared 12-month treatment outcomes of intravitreal injections of brolucizumab (IVBr) with aflibercept (IVA) for treatment-naïve exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Patients were given three monthly IVBr or IVA injections and were followed up monthly for 12 months. Additional injections were given if exudation or hemorrhage recurred. The study included 339 eyes in 339 patients divided into the IVBr or IVA groups. In both groups, central retinal thickness (CRT) and subfoveal choroidal thickness significantly decreased, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) significantly improved at the 12-month visit. BCVA improvement was similar in both groups (<i>P</i> = 0.27). Age, baseline BCVA, and thickness of the central retina and subfoveal choroid were associated with the 12-month BCVA. The proportion of patients who did not require additional injections was 33% in the IVBr and 30% in the IVA group (<i>P</i> = 0.58). The number of additional injections showed a trend favoring IVBr over IVA but the difference was insignificant (<i>P</i> = 0.055). Age, risk alleles of <i>ARMS2</i> A69S, and baseline CRT were associated with shorter retreatment-free period. In conclusion, IVBr achieved similar visual and anatomic treatment outcomes to IVA with a trend toward requiring fewer additional injections during 12-month follow-up of as-needed regimen for exudative AMD.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Brolucizumab versus aflibercept in treating exudative age-related macular degeneration: a 12-month pro re nata regimen

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月5日

查看全文
  • Wataru Kikushima,
  • Yoichi Sakurada,
  • Yoshiko Fukuda,
  • Seigo Yoneyama,
  • Yumi Kotoda,
  • Daphne Viel Tsuru,
  • Kenji Kashiwagi

摘要

We compared 12-month treatment outcomes of intravitreal injections of brolucizumab (IVBr) with aflibercept (IVA) for treatment-naïve exudative age-related macular degeneration (AMD). Patients were given three monthly IVBr or IVA injections and were followed up monthly for 12 months. Additional injections were given if exudation or hemorrhage recurred. The study included 339 eyes in 339 patients divided into the IVBr or IVA groups. In both groups, central retinal thickness (CRT) and subfoveal choroidal thickness significantly decreased, and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) significantly improved at the 12-month visit. BCVA improvement was similar in both groups (P = 0.27). Age, baseline BCVA, and thickness of the central retina and subfoveal choroid were associated with the 12-month BCVA. The proportion of patients who did not require additional injections was 33% in the IVBr and 30% in the IVA group (P = 0.58). The number of additional injections showed a trend favoring IVBr over IVA but the difference was insignificant (P = 0.055). Age, risk alleles of ARMS2 A69S, and baseline CRT were associated with shorter retreatment-free period. In conclusion, IVBr achieved similar visual and anatomic treatment outcomes to IVA with a trend toward requiring fewer additional injections during 12-month follow-up of as-needed regimen for exudative AMD.