Scholarlink

<p>The aim of this study was to validate the Swedish version of Eating Assessment Tool (S-EAT-10) for head and neck cancer patients. The participants (n = 60) had persistent swallowing difficulties 6–36&#xa0;months after completion of curative radiotherapy. The videofluoroscopic swallowing study was assessed using the Penetration Aspiration Scale and the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale modified for videofluoroscopy. Participants completed questionnaires S-EAT-10, M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) and study-specific questions. Internal consistency was excellent and the test–retest reliability was good. Regarding convergent validity, S-EAT-10 showed moderate to strong correlation with the MDADI and no to weak correlation with study-specific questions regarding meal duration and weight change. Regarding criterion validity, there was a weak correlation between S-EAT-10 and instrumental measures. S-EAT-10 showed 85% sensitivity in identifying patients with dysphagia. S-EAT-10 could not discriminate between different degrees of dysphagia. Thus, S-EAT-10 showed sufficient psychometric properties regarding head and neck cancer patients.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Validation of the Swedish Eating Assessment Tool, S-EAT-10, for patients with head and neck cancer

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年4月16日

查看全文
  • Linnéa Ekström,
  • Lotta Sjökvist Wilk,
  • Caterina Finizia,
  • Lisa Tuomi

摘要

The aim of this study was to validate the Swedish version of Eating Assessment Tool (S-EAT-10) for head and neck cancer patients. The participants (n = 60) had persistent swallowing difficulties 6–36 months after completion of curative radiotherapy. The videofluoroscopic swallowing study was assessed using the Penetration Aspiration Scale and the Yale Pharyngeal Residue Severity Rating Scale modified for videofluoroscopy. Participants completed questionnaires S-EAT-10, M.D. Anderson Dysphagia Inventory (MDADI) and study-specific questions. Internal consistency was excellent and the test–retest reliability was good. Regarding convergent validity, S-EAT-10 showed moderate to strong correlation with the MDADI and no to weak correlation with study-specific questions regarding meal duration and weight change. Regarding criterion validity, there was a weak correlation between S-EAT-10 and instrumental measures. S-EAT-10 showed 85% sensitivity in identifying patients with dysphagia. S-EAT-10 could not discriminate between different degrees of dysphagia. Thus, S-EAT-10 showed sufficient psychometric properties regarding head and neck cancer patients.