<p>Monoclonal antibodies have two core mechanisms of protection: an antibody’s antigen-binding fragment (Fab) can bind and neutralize viral pathogens and its fragment crystallizable domain (Fc) catalyzes effector functions. We investigated the relative contribution of Fab-&#xa0;versus Fc-mediated mechanisms of protection through passive administration of distinct forms of the pan-reactive anti-influenza antibody CR9114. We demonstrated that the contribution of Fc-independent (Fab-dependent) versus Fc-dependent mechanisms of protection is defined by the route of administration. We used CR9114 variants (wild-type, two Fc-silenced variants, or the bivalent antigen-binding fragment F(ab′)<sub>2</sub>), administered either intravenously or intranasally. We found that intravenously-administered CR9114 requires the Fc domain to provide potent, pre-exposure protection against influenza A and B viral challenge. In contrast, when CR9114 was administered locally to the nasal mucosa, the main mode of protection was provided by F(ab′)<sub>2</sub>, and was largely Fc-independent. Importantly, this mode of protection following intranasal administration also applied to non-neutralized influenza B strains. Moreover, intranasal administration resulted in an increase in potency against influenza A/H1N1, A/H5N1, A/H3N2, B/Yam and B/Vic compared to intravenous administration up to 50-fold. These results shed new light on the application of monoclonal antibodies such as CR9114 to combat viral infection locally, and will help inform clinical strategies of pre-exposure prophylaxis. More fundamentally, this study uncovers distinct modes of protection for systemic versus intranasally-administered prophylactic antibodies.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Intranasal administration of a panreactive influenza antibody reveals Fc-independent mode of protection

  • Anna L. Beukenhorst,
  • Keira L. Rice,
  • Jacopo Frallicciardi,
  • Martin H. Koldijk,
  • Carolyn M. Boudreau,
  • Justin Crawford,
  • Lisette A. H. M. Cornelissen,
  • Kelly A. S. da Costa,
  • Babette A. de Jong,
  • Stephanie Fischinger,
  • Boris Julg,
  • Jaco M. Klap,
  • Clarissa M. Koch,
  • Zoltán Magyarics,
  • Faez A. Nait Mohamed,
  • Vintus Okonkwo,
  • Lindsey Adams,
  • Caitlin M. McCarthy,
  • Larance Ronsard,
  • Nigel Temperton,
  • Helene Vietsch,
  • Kanin Wichapong,
  • Bertjan Ziere,
  • Daniel Lingwood,
  • Jaap Goudsmit

摘要

Monoclonal antibodies have two core mechanisms of protection: an antibody’s antigen-binding fragment (Fab) can bind and neutralize viral pathogens and its fragment crystallizable domain (Fc) catalyzes effector functions. We investigated the relative contribution of Fab- versus Fc-mediated mechanisms of protection through passive administration of distinct forms of the pan-reactive anti-influenza antibody CR9114. We demonstrated that the contribution of Fc-independent (Fab-dependent) versus Fc-dependent mechanisms of protection is defined by the route of administration. We used CR9114 variants (wild-type, two Fc-silenced variants, or the bivalent antigen-binding fragment F(ab′)2), administered either intravenously or intranasally. We found that intravenously-administered CR9114 requires the Fc domain to provide potent, pre-exposure protection against influenza A and B viral challenge. In contrast, when CR9114 was administered locally to the nasal mucosa, the main mode of protection was provided by F(ab′)2, and was largely Fc-independent. Importantly, this mode of protection following intranasal administration also applied to non-neutralized influenza B strains. Moreover, intranasal administration resulted in an increase in potency against influenza A/H1N1, A/H5N1, A/H3N2, B/Yam and B/Vic compared to intravenous administration up to 50-fold. These results shed new light on the application of monoclonal antibodies such as CR9114 to combat viral infection locally, and will help inform clinical strategies of pre-exposure prophylaxis. More fundamentally, this study uncovers distinct modes of protection for systemic versus intranasally-administered prophylactic antibodies.