Scholarlink

<p>The rapid development of low-cost sensors provides the opportunity to greatly advance the scope and extent of monitoring of indoor air pollution. In this study, calibrated particle matter (PM) sensors and a non-negative matrix factorisation (NMF) source apportionment technique are used to investigate PM concentrations and source contributions across three households in an urban residential area. The NMF is applied to combined data from all houses to generate source profiles that can be used to understand how PM source characteristics are similar or differ between different households in the same urban area. PM<sub>2.5</sub> and PM<sub>10</sub> concentrations in all three houses were greater, more variable, and significantly different to ambient concentrations recorded at a nearby ambient monitoring site. Concentrations were also significantly different between houses, with the World Health Organisation 24-h guideline limits for PM<sub>2.5</sub> breached in one household. The applied methodology was highly successful at modelling concentrations for all the houses (R<sup>2</sup> <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_85985_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="15" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="19" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\ge\)</EquationSource> <EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math> <mo>≥</mo> </math></EquationSource> </InlineEquation> 0.983), finding that across the houses the I/O (indoor to outdoor sources ratio) was the lowest for PM<sub>1</sub> (down to 0.08), and greatest for PM<sub>10</sub> (up to 4.93). Whilst the sources could not be clearly distinguished further than being outdoors or indoors, the methodology provides clear insights to source variability within and between the monitored houses. These results highlight the importance of monitoring indoor air pollution to improve pollution exposure estimates, as whilst people may live in areas with acceptable ambient air quality, they can be exposed to unhealthy concentrations in their own homes. This method may be applied in future studies for extended periods to investigate the influence of source seasonality on PM concentrations or scaled up to investigate source variability across larger geographical areas.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Using low-cost sensors to assess common air pollution sources across multiple residences

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年1月13日

查看全文
  • Catrin J. Rathbone,
  • Dimitrios Bousiotis,
  • Owain G. Rose,
  • Francis D. Pope

摘要

The rapid development of low-cost sensors provides the opportunity to greatly advance the scope and extent of monitoring of indoor air pollution. In this study, calibrated particle matter (PM) sensors and a non-negative matrix factorisation (NMF) source apportionment technique are used to investigate PM concentrations and source contributions across three households in an urban residential area. The NMF is applied to combined data from all houses to generate source profiles that can be used to understand how PM source characteristics are similar or differ between different households in the same urban area. PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations in all three houses were greater, more variable, and significantly different to ambient concentrations recorded at a nearby ambient monitoring site. Concentrations were also significantly different between houses, with the World Health Organisation 24-h guideline limits for PM2.5 breached in one household. The applied methodology was highly successful at modelling concentrations for all the houses (R2 \(\ge\) ≥ 0.983), finding that across the houses the I/O (indoor to outdoor sources ratio) was the lowest for PM1 (down to 0.08), and greatest for PM10 (up to 4.93). Whilst the sources could not be clearly distinguished further than being outdoors or indoors, the methodology provides clear insights to source variability within and between the monitored houses. These results highlight the importance of monitoring indoor air pollution to improve pollution exposure estimates, as whilst people may live in areas with acceptable ambient air quality, they can be exposed to unhealthy concentrations in their own homes. This method may be applied in future studies for extended periods to investigate the influence of source seasonality on PM concentrations or scaled up to investigate source variability across larger geographical areas.