Scholarlink

<p>Reliable chairside adoption of digital orthodontics depends on micrometre-scale slot fidelity and stable bracket–wire tribology. A single computer-aided design for a personalized second-premolar bracket was manufactured by lost-wax casting and by selective laser melting (SLM) (n = 36 per method). Slot height and inter-wall angle were measured on both the support-facing and non-support surfaces. Static and dynamic friction were evaluated using stainless-steel rectangular wires ligated either with tightly twisted stainless-steel ties or with elastomeric modules. Mean slot height was 480.88 ± 73.90&#xa0;µm for casting and 421.47 ± 32.03&#xa0;µm for SLM, against a nominal 480&#xa0;µm. Overall height error did not differ between methods (<i>P</i> = 0.673), whereas angle er-ror was greater for SLM (17.76 ± 11.29°) than for casting (9.56 ± 8.88°, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). The support-facing wall consistently showed reduced accuracy: in casting, height error in-creased on the support side (<i>P</i> = 0.001); in SLM, both height and angle errors increased on the support side (both <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Across conditions, static friction exceeded dynamic friction (all <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). With steel ligation, friction was higher for casting than SLM (median static 6.00 N vs 4.35 N, <i>P</i> = 0.007; median dynamic 5.03 N vs 3.83 N, <i>P</i> = 0.011). With elastomeric ligation, the ranking reversed, with higher friction for SLM (median static 2.95 N vs 2.05 N, <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001; median dynamic 2.54 N vs 2.03 N, <i>P</i> = 0.003). In this standardized local in vitro model, findings suggest a surface-dependent reduction in accuracy at the support-facing wall and a fabrication-by-ligation interaction that may alter the frictional ranking between steel and elastomeric ligations. Cast brackets showed more consistent full-wire seating, whereas SLM brackets may benefit from calibrated design offsets and targeted finishing to limit undersized or tapered slots; validation beyond this setup is needed.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Slot fidelity and ligation-dependent tribology in personalized brackets made by casting versus selective laser melting: an in vitro study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月6日

查看全文
  • Viet Anh Nguyen,
  • Minh Ngoc Tran,
  • Ngo The Minh Pham,
  • Thi Bich Ngoc Ha,
  • Viet Hoang,
  • Thi Quynh Trang Vuong

摘要

Reliable chairside adoption of digital orthodontics depends on micrometre-scale slot fidelity and stable bracket–wire tribology. A single computer-aided design for a personalized second-premolar bracket was manufactured by lost-wax casting and by selective laser melting (SLM) (n = 36 per method). Slot height and inter-wall angle were measured on both the support-facing and non-support surfaces. Static and dynamic friction were evaluated using stainless-steel rectangular wires ligated either with tightly twisted stainless-steel ties or with elastomeric modules. Mean slot height was 480.88 ± 73.90 µm for casting and 421.47 ± 32.03 µm for SLM, against a nominal 480 µm. Overall height error did not differ between methods (P = 0.673), whereas angle er-ror was greater for SLM (17.76 ± 11.29°) than for casting (9.56 ± 8.88°, P < 0.001). The support-facing wall consistently showed reduced accuracy: in casting, height error in-creased on the support side (P = 0.001); in SLM, both height and angle errors increased on the support side (both P < 0.001). Across conditions, static friction exceeded dynamic friction (all P < 0.001). With steel ligation, friction was higher for casting than SLM (median static 6.00 N vs 4.35 N, P = 0.007; median dynamic 5.03 N vs 3.83 N, P = 0.011). With elastomeric ligation, the ranking reversed, with higher friction for SLM (median static 2.95 N vs 2.05 N, P < 0.001; median dynamic 2.54 N vs 2.03 N, P = 0.003). In this standardized local in vitro model, findings suggest a surface-dependent reduction in accuracy at the support-facing wall and a fabrication-by-ligation interaction that may alter the frictional ranking between steel and elastomeric ligations. Cast brackets showed more consistent full-wire seating, whereas SLM brackets may benefit from calibrated design offsets and targeted finishing to limit undersized or tapered slots; validation beyond this setup is needed.