Scholarlink

<p>This study aimed to evaluate the quasi-static compressive loading of lithium disilicate and hybrid ceramic veneers at two ceramic thicknesses (0.5&#xa0;mm and 1.0&#xa0;mm), with and without the interposition of ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) plates simulating custom mouthguards. A total of 12 experimental groups were established, combining two ceramic types (lithium disilicate and hybrid ceramic), two ceramic thicknesses (0.5&#xa0;mm and 1.0&#xa0;mm), and three EVA plates conditions (no interposition EVA on ceramic – control, EVA with 2.0&#xa0;mm and EVA 4.0&#xa0;mm). Ceramic discs were fabricated, cemented onto epoxy resin fiber-reinforced cylinders (G10, dentin analog), and the ceramic/EVA assembly was subjected to compressive loading in a universal testing machine until catastrophic failure occurred. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). Hybrid ceramic showed higher fracture resistance than lithium disilicate (2.886&#xa0;N vs. 2.314&#xa0;N; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Ceramic thickness had no significant effect (0.5&#xa0;mm: 2.551&#xa0;N; 1.0&#xa0;mm: 2.649&#xa0;N; <i>p</i> = 0.098). EVA interposition significantly increased strength (4&#xa0;mm: 3.074&#xa0;<i>N</i> &gt; 2&#xa0;mm: 2.705&#xa0;N &gt; control: 2.021&#xa0;N; all <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). Within its limitations, this study demonstrated that the interposition of EVA plates improved the fracture resistance of the ceramic material under quasi-static loading, especially with 4-mm thickness. Hybrid ceramic exhibited superior quasi-static load-to-fracture resistance compared with lithium disilicate, particularly when combined with EVA plates.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Protective effect of EVA layers under quasi-static loading for veneer-like ceramic discs

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年1月29日

查看全文
  • Leandro Notari Chester,
  • Fabiana Guirado Faggioni,
  • Marina Amaral,
  • Kusai Baroudi,
  • Elias D. Berdouses,
  • Davi Romeiro Aquino,
  • Nathália de Carvalho Ramos,
  • João Paulo Mendes Tribst,
  • Laís Regiane da Silva Concilio

摘要

This study aimed to evaluate the quasi-static compressive loading of lithium disilicate and hybrid ceramic veneers at two ceramic thicknesses (0.5 mm and 1.0 mm), with and without the interposition of ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA) plates simulating custom mouthguards. A total of 12 experimental groups were established, combining two ceramic types (lithium disilicate and hybrid ceramic), two ceramic thicknesses (0.5 mm and 1.0 mm), and three EVA plates conditions (no interposition EVA on ceramic – control, EVA with 2.0 mm and EVA 4.0 mm). Ceramic discs were fabricated, cemented onto epoxy resin fiber-reinforced cylinders (G10, dentin analog), and the ceramic/EVA assembly was subjected to compressive loading in a universal testing machine until catastrophic failure occurred. Data were analyzed using three-way ANOVA with Tukey’s post hoc test (p < 0.05). Hybrid ceramic showed higher fracture resistance than lithium disilicate (2.886 N vs. 2.314 N; p < 0.001). Ceramic thickness had no significant effect (0.5 mm: 2.551 N; 1.0 mm: 2.649 N; p = 0.098). EVA interposition significantly increased strength (4 mm: 3.074 N > 2 mm: 2.705 N > control: 2.021 N; all p < 0.001). Within its limitations, this study demonstrated that the interposition of EVA plates improved the fracture resistance of the ceramic material under quasi-static loading, especially with 4-mm thickness. Hybrid ceramic exhibited superior quasi-static load-to-fracture resistance compared with lithium disilicate, particularly when combined with EVA plates.