Scholarlink

<p>This study investigated the comparative effects of small-sided games (SSG) and Hoff circuit (HC) training on physical, technical, and psychophysiological parameters in highly trained youth soccer players. Twenty-six youth players from a professional team were randomly allocated to either an SSG group (n = 13, age = 17.53 ± 0.49&#xa0;years) or an HC group (n = 13, age = 17.54 ± 0.5&#xa0;years). The six-week intervention comprised two additional training sessions per week alongside regular team training. Pre- and post-program assessments evaluated physical performance (Vameval test, 5-Jump Test, 10&#xa0;m and 30&#xa0;m sprints, and Illinois agility test), technical skills (passing accuracy, possession, interceptions, tackling, and heading). Perceptual responses (RPE and PACES) were evaluated after each session. The HC protocol involved a 290&#xa0;m dribbling circuit performed at 90–95% HRmax, whereas the SSG emphasized ball possession and tactical gameplay under game-like conditions. The results showed that both training modalities significantly improved maximum aerobic speed (MAS) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). However, the SSG group demonstrated superior improvements in sprint performance (10&#xa0;m and 30&#xa0;m; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) and agility (Illinois test; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.01) compared to the HC group. SSG training was also more effective in enhancing technical skills, particularly passing accuracy (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) and interceptions (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). No significant between-group differences were observed in heart rate responses (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05) or RPE (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). Notably, SSG participants reported significantly higher enjoyment levels (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), suggesting enhanced motivation and training adherence. SSG training offers superior benefits for sprint performance, agility, technical skill development, and player enjoyment compared to circuit-based training in youth soccer players. These findings support the integration of SSG as a primary training methodology for coaches seeking to optimize athletic performance, technical proficiency, and player engagement in youth soccer development programs.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Effects of small-sided games and dribbling circuit training on physical and technical skills in youth soccer players

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年12月11日

查看全文
  • Mohamed Amine Rahmoune,
  • Okba Selmi,
  • Souheir Bouali,
  • Anissa Bouassida,
  • Dan Iulian Alexe,
  • Monira I. Aldhahi,
  • Adin Marian Cojocaru,
  • Mirela Ştef,
  • Cristina Ioana Alexe

摘要

This study investigated the comparative effects of small-sided games (SSG) and Hoff circuit (HC) training on physical, technical, and psychophysiological parameters in highly trained youth soccer players. Twenty-six youth players from a professional team were randomly allocated to either an SSG group (n = 13, age = 17.53 ± 0.49 years) or an HC group (n = 13, age = 17.54 ± 0.5 years). The six-week intervention comprised two additional training sessions per week alongside regular team training. Pre- and post-program assessments evaluated physical performance (Vameval test, 5-Jump Test, 10 m and 30 m sprints, and Illinois agility test), technical skills (passing accuracy, possession, interceptions, tackling, and heading). Perceptual responses (RPE and PACES) were evaluated after each session. The HC protocol involved a 290 m dribbling circuit performed at 90–95% HRmax, whereas the SSG emphasized ball possession and tactical gameplay under game-like conditions. The results showed that both training modalities significantly improved maximum aerobic speed (MAS) (p < 0.05). However, the SSG group demonstrated superior improvements in sprint performance (10 m and 30 m; p < 0.01) and agility (Illinois test; p < 0.01) compared to the HC group. SSG training was also more effective in enhancing technical skills, particularly passing accuracy (p < 0.05) and interceptions (p < 0.05). No significant between-group differences were observed in heart rate responses (p > 0.05) or RPE (p > 0.05). Notably, SSG participants reported significantly higher enjoyment levels (p < 0.05), suggesting enhanced motivation and training adherence. SSG training offers superior benefits for sprint performance, agility, technical skill development, and player enjoyment compared to circuit-based training in youth soccer players. These findings support the integration of SSG as a primary training methodology for coaches seeking to optimize athletic performance, technical proficiency, and player engagement in youth soccer development programs.