<p>The aim of this study was to construct a radiomics nomogram for prediction of breast masses (BMs) by analyzing the clinical characteristics of the patients as well as radiomics features of two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound images and strain elastography images. In this retrospective study, 219 patients diagnosed with BMs were enrolled and randomly divided into training set and testing set in a 7:3 ratio. Radiomics nomogram was constructed based on clinical features and Radscore to compare area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with another models. The AUCs of the training set were 0.83, 0.91, 0.92, 0.96, and 0.99 for the clinical model, elastography radiomics model, 2D radiomics model, bimodal radiomics model, and nomogram, respectively, and the AUCs of the testing set were 0.86, 0.87, 0.91, 0.93, and 0.95, respectively. There were significant differences in AUC between nomogram and another models (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). 2D ultrasound radiomics model and strain elastography radiomics model were of diagnostic value in identifying BMs. The bimodal radiomics model was superior to these two single-modal radiomics models. Nomogram can further enhance the diagnosis of BMs and contribute valuable information for clinical decision making.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A study on the value of ultrasound strain elastography-based radiomics nomogram in the differential diagnosis of breast masses

  • Yunpei Zhu,
  • Yanping Dou,
  • Qifan Hu,
  • Hui Wang

摘要

The aim of this study was to construct a radiomics nomogram for prediction of breast masses (BMs) by analyzing the clinical characteristics of the patients as well as radiomics features of two-dimensional (2D) ultrasound images and strain elastography images. In this retrospective study, 219 patients diagnosed with BMs were enrolled and randomly divided into training set and testing set in a 7:3 ratio. Radiomics nomogram was constructed based on clinical features and Radscore to compare area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) with another models. The AUCs of the training set were 0.83, 0.91, 0.92, 0.96, and 0.99 for the clinical model, elastography radiomics model, 2D radiomics model, bimodal radiomics model, and nomogram, respectively, and the AUCs of the testing set were 0.86, 0.87, 0.91, 0.93, and 0.95, respectively. There were significant differences in AUC between nomogram and another models (p < 0.05). 2D ultrasound radiomics model and strain elastography radiomics model were of diagnostic value in identifying BMs. The bimodal radiomics model was superior to these two single-modal radiomics models. Nomogram can further enhance the diagnosis of BMs and contribute valuable information for clinical decision making.