Scholarlink

<p>A single, arterial-optimized 4D-flow MRI acquisition may enable fast assessment of both cerebral arterial and venous flow. However, arteries and veins require different velocity encoding (VENC) settings for optimal velocity-to-noise ratio (VNR). Consequently, venous measurements using arterial-optimized VENC settings are subject to reduced VNR and require further evaluation. This study compared cerebral venous flow and pulsatility assessments using a high-VENC (110&#xa0;cm/s, adapted to the arterial system) and a low-VENC (40&#xa0;cm/s, adapted to the venous system) 4D-flow MRI sequence at 3 Tesla. Flow and pulsatility index (PI) were calculated for cerebral veins, sinuses and internal jugular veins in 36 elderly volunteers (79 ± 5 years). The high-VENC acquisitions allowed visualization of nearly all venous structures. Mean flow differences were small and the correlation, strong, when comparing both acquisitions across sinuses (<i>R</i> = 0.90–0.99, difference = -8–7%) and cortical veins (<i>R</i> = 0.93, difference = − 6%). Inflow-outflow differences at the confluence of sinuses were similar between acquisitions. PI showed moderate to strong agreement except in the straight sinus. Both the vein of Galen and the jugular veins suffered from aliasing in the venous VENC acquisitions. In summary, this study demonstrated that a VENC setting adapted for the arterial cerebral circulation was feasible for studying cerebral venous flow and pulsatility.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Arterial-optimized 4D-flow MRI for quantifying flow and pulsatility in venous sinuses and large cerebral veins

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月20日

查看全文
  • Arvid Westlund,
  • Anders Wåhlin,
  • Jan Malm,
  • Anders Eklund

摘要

A single, arterial-optimized 4D-flow MRI acquisition may enable fast assessment of both cerebral arterial and venous flow. However, arteries and veins require different velocity encoding (VENC) settings for optimal velocity-to-noise ratio (VNR). Consequently, venous measurements using arterial-optimized VENC settings are subject to reduced VNR and require further evaluation. This study compared cerebral venous flow and pulsatility assessments using a high-VENC (110 cm/s, adapted to the arterial system) and a low-VENC (40 cm/s, adapted to the venous system) 4D-flow MRI sequence at 3 Tesla. Flow and pulsatility index (PI) were calculated for cerebral veins, sinuses and internal jugular veins in 36 elderly volunteers (79 ± 5 years). The high-VENC acquisitions allowed visualization of nearly all venous structures. Mean flow differences were small and the correlation, strong, when comparing both acquisitions across sinuses (R = 0.90–0.99, difference = -8–7%) and cortical veins (R = 0.93, difference = − 6%). Inflow-outflow differences at the confluence of sinuses were similar between acquisitions. PI showed moderate to strong agreement except in the straight sinus. Both the vein of Galen and the jugular veins suffered from aliasing in the venous VENC acquisitions. In summary, this study demonstrated that a VENC setting adapted for the arterial cerebral circulation was feasible for studying cerebral venous flow and pulsatility.