Scholarlink

<p>Recycling construction and demolition waste (C&amp;DW) into recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) is a sustainable strategy to reduce resource consumption and emissions. Most life cycle assessments (LCAs) focus on a single country and region, limiting broader applicability. This study conducts a novel comparative LCA of C&amp;DW recycling systems across six countries and regions. By evaluating energy consumption, global warming potential (GWP), and fossil CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) production, significant regional differences are revealed, largely influenced by infrastructure, processing efficiency, and transport. In countries with mature recycling systems, RCA production reduces GWP by up to 97% per ton compared to natural aggregates manufacturing. Conversely, longer transport distances or inefficient operations in less developed systems can offset these benefits. While RCA generally demonstrates lower environmental impacts, its advantage is highly context-dependent. However, standardized global guidelines remain challenging due to regional disparities in waste sources and processing.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Cross-country life cycle assessment of construction and demolition waste recycling with evaluation of energy use, carbon emissions, and regional trade-offs

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月21日

查看全文
  • Seyyed Ahmad Hosseini,
  • Vahid Asghari,
  • Xiaoyi Liu,
  • Shu-Chien Hsu,
  • Chi-Sun Poon

摘要

Recycling construction and demolition waste (C&DW) into recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) is a sustainable strategy to reduce resource consumption and emissions. Most life cycle assessments (LCAs) focus on a single country and region, limiting broader applicability. This study conducts a novel comparative LCA of C&DW recycling systems across six countries and regions. By evaluating energy consumption, global warming potential (GWP), and fossil CO2 emissions in recycled concrete aggregate (RCA) production, significant regional differences are revealed, largely influenced by infrastructure, processing efficiency, and transport. In countries with mature recycling systems, RCA production reduces GWP by up to 97% per ton compared to natural aggregates manufacturing. Conversely, longer transport distances or inefficient operations in less developed systems can offset these benefits. While RCA generally demonstrates lower environmental impacts, its advantage is highly context-dependent. However, standardized global guidelines remain challenging due to regional disparities in waste sources and processing.