Scholarlink

<p>By comparing the application of the Shikani optical stylet (SOS) technique with that of UEscope, the effectiveness and safety of the one-person SOS technique for pediatric nasotracheal intubation (NTI) undergoing dental treatment were evaluated. In total, 60 children scheduled for elective dental treatments were randomly categorized into two groups for intubation under controlled ventilation without the use of neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBD): SOS (<i>n</i> = 30) and UEscope (<i>n</i> = 30). The main endpoint was total intubation time, besides secondary outcomes included frequency and duration of additional assistance, and total dosage of propofol titrated for induction. The total intubation time was significantly shorter in the SOS group at 60.6&#xa0;s (Q1-Q3, 56.0–65.0) compared to 76.1&#xa0;s (67.0–87.0) in the UEscope group (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Additionally, the SOS group did not require additional assistance to expose the glottis, whereas the UEscope group required additional assistance in 15 cases (median duration of 5.8&#xa0;s). The total dosage of propofol titrated for induction was 1.3 ± 0.4&#xa0;mg/kg in the SOS group, whereas it was 1.6 ± 0.6&#xa0;mg/kg in the UEscope group (<i>P</i> = 0.034). Compared to UEscope, the one-person technique of SOS requires significantly less intubation time, additional assistance, and total dosage of propofol titrated for induction for pediatric NTI undergoing dental treatment in dental clinics.</p><p><i>Clinical trial registration</i>. ChiCTR2400079441, 3/01/2024.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Randomized controlled trial of Shikani optical stylet’s one-person technique in nasotracheal intubation for children undergoing dental treatment

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月21日

查看全文
  • Wei Cui,
  • Xiang Zhang,
  • Ying Shang,
  • Mengkun Ding,
  • Zhibo Zhou

摘要

By comparing the application of the Shikani optical stylet (SOS) technique with that of UEscope, the effectiveness and safety of the one-person SOS technique for pediatric nasotracheal intubation (NTI) undergoing dental treatment were evaluated. In total, 60 children scheduled for elective dental treatments were randomly categorized into two groups for intubation under controlled ventilation without the use of neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBD): SOS (n = 30) and UEscope (n = 30). The main endpoint was total intubation time, besides secondary outcomes included frequency and duration of additional assistance, and total dosage of propofol titrated for induction. The total intubation time was significantly shorter in the SOS group at 60.6 s (Q1-Q3, 56.0–65.0) compared to 76.1 s (67.0–87.0) in the UEscope group (P < 0.001). Additionally, the SOS group did not require additional assistance to expose the glottis, whereas the UEscope group required additional assistance in 15 cases (median duration of 5.8 s). The total dosage of propofol titrated for induction was 1.3 ± 0.4 mg/kg in the SOS group, whereas it was 1.6 ± 0.6 mg/kg in the UEscope group (P = 0.034). Compared to UEscope, the one-person technique of SOS requires significantly less intubation time, additional assistance, and total dosage of propofol titrated for induction for pediatric NTI undergoing dental treatment in dental clinics.

Clinical trial registration. ChiCTR2400079441, 3/01/2024.