<p>Grout veins formed by advance grouting influence bulk stiffness and permeability. We present a width‑centric, image‑to‑mechanics framework that performs SES preprocessing (HDMR‑based multi‑feature fusion and a moment‑based sub‑pixel localizer), extracts graph‑theoretic centerlines, and estimates vein widths via T<sub><i>MSE</i></sub>-adaptive segmentation, which directly supports property estimation. On a lab‑scale image set, SES improves segmentation across seven backbones, and the resulting width/orientation statistics yield laboratory‑scale estimates of elastic modulus and permeability. Worst‑case errors are 8.83% (modulus) and 10.42% (permeability); these do not meet design‑grade tolerances. The method is therefore positioned for screening/monitoring under controlled conditions, not for design decisions. We clarify assumptions (local monotonic edge profile, 2‑D effective analysis), provide stopping criteria and parameters for reproducibility.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A width centric image to mechanics framework for assessing advance grouting with TMSE adaptive width segmentation and lab scale validation

  • Pengcheng Zhu,
  • Zhilei Zhang,
  • Tielin Chen,
  • Rongxin Wang,
  • Dingli Zhang,
  • Li Zhu,
  • Jing Guo

摘要

Grout veins formed by advance grouting influence bulk stiffness and permeability. We present a width‑centric, image‑to‑mechanics framework that performs SES preprocessing (HDMR‑based multi‑feature fusion and a moment‑based sub‑pixel localizer), extracts graph‑theoretic centerlines, and estimates vein widths via TMSE-adaptive segmentation, which directly supports property estimation. On a lab‑scale image set, SES improves segmentation across seven backbones, and the resulting width/orientation statistics yield laboratory‑scale estimates of elastic modulus and permeability. Worst‑case errors are 8.83% (modulus) and 10.42% (permeability); these do not meet design‑grade tolerances. The method is therefore positioned for screening/monitoring under controlled conditions, not for design decisions. We clarify assumptions (local monotonic edge profile, 2‑D effective analysis), provide stopping criteria and parameters for reproducibility.