Scholarlink

<p>Duration processing can be indexed by the amplitude of two electrophysiological potentials, the contingent negative variation (CNV) and the late positive component (LPC). When a currently elapsing event becomes longer than that of a memorized standard, CNV amplitude begins to resolve back to baseline even if the event is not yet over, and LPC amplitude, evoked by event offset, is reduced. Using electroencephalography in 30 human participants, we examined whether these patterns were unique to explicit duration judgements or might also be observed during spatial judgements. Two dynamic visual stimuli were presented consecutively on each trial. The relative duration (temporal task) or distance (spatial task) of the second stimulus was compared to the first. Confirming prior findings, CNV dynamics and LPC amplitude reflected the relative duration of the two stimuli. However, this occurred only when duration was task-relevant during the temporal task, not when it was irrelevant during the spatial task. Moreover, CNV and LPC activity indexed relative distance only when distance was task-relevant in the spatial (not temporal) task. Together these results suggest that CNV and LPC dynamics reflect domain-general mechanisms for processing the magnitude of task-relevant stimulus features, whether in the temporal (duration) or spatial (distance) dimension.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Common electrophysiological signatures of relative magnitude in both space and time

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年11月11日

查看全文
  • Estelle Mieulet,
  • Kamila Smigasiewicz,
  • Inga Korolczuk,
  • Laurence Casini,
  • Franck Vidal,
  • Jennifer T. Coull

摘要

Duration processing can be indexed by the amplitude of two electrophysiological potentials, the contingent negative variation (CNV) and the late positive component (LPC). When a currently elapsing event becomes longer than that of a memorized standard, CNV amplitude begins to resolve back to baseline even if the event is not yet over, and LPC amplitude, evoked by event offset, is reduced. Using electroencephalography in 30 human participants, we examined whether these patterns were unique to explicit duration judgements or might also be observed during spatial judgements. Two dynamic visual stimuli were presented consecutively on each trial. The relative duration (temporal task) or distance (spatial task) of the second stimulus was compared to the first. Confirming prior findings, CNV dynamics and LPC amplitude reflected the relative duration of the two stimuli. However, this occurred only when duration was task-relevant during the temporal task, not when it was irrelevant during the spatial task. Moreover, CNV and LPC activity indexed relative distance only when distance was task-relevant in the spatial (not temporal) task. Together these results suggest that CNV and LPC dynamics reflect domain-general mechanisms for processing the magnitude of task-relevant stimulus features, whether in the temporal (duration) or spatial (distance) dimension.