Scholarlink

<p>Home management of the home and family, including household chores, childrearing, caregiving and shopping, can be a burden, especially when the person or a family member is ill or affected by psychological or social issues. We developed a subjective indicator of this burden, the self-report, five-item, five-point Likert scale “Perceived Home Management Hassles Scale”. Here, we evaluated the psychometric validity of the scale, using an online questionnaire survey among members of the Japanese Association for Research in Family Nursing. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the unidimensional structure (CFI = 0.999, RMSEA = 0.028, SRMR = 0.007). Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s Omega was 0.92 and 0.93, respectively. Mean score was higher among participants with childrearing responsibilities than in those without (n = 198, mean = 10.3, SD = 5.24, vs. n = 312, mean = 6.4, SD = 4.59; p &lt; 0.001), and among those with caregiving responsibilities than in those without (n = 81, mean = 9.6, SD = 5.11, vs. n = 829, mean = 7.6, SD = 5.21; p = 0.002). Score was independently associated with Kessler-6 score (<i>B</i> = 0.33, β = 0.331, p &lt; 0.001) and mediated the negative effects of childrearing/caregiving. The Perceived Home Management Hassles Scale demonstrated sufficient structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity, including known-groups and convergent validity. Test-retest reliability and generalizability to general populations awaits further research.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Psychometric validity of the Perceived Home Management Hassles Scale

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年9月1日

查看全文
  • Iori Sato,
  • Mariko Sakka,
  • Miyuki Muramoto,
  • Mari Ikeda

摘要

Home management of the home and family, including household chores, childrearing, caregiving and shopping, can be a burden, especially when the person or a family member is ill or affected by psychological or social issues. We developed a subjective indicator of this burden, the self-report, five-item, five-point Likert scale “Perceived Home Management Hassles Scale”. Here, we evaluated the psychometric validity of the scale, using an online questionnaire survey among members of the Japanese Association for Research in Family Nursing. Confirmatory factor analyses supported the unidimensional structure (CFI = 0.999, RMSEA = 0.028, SRMR = 0.007). Cronbach’s alpha and McDonald’s Omega was 0.92 and 0.93, respectively. Mean score was higher among participants with childrearing responsibilities than in those without (n = 198, mean = 10.3, SD = 5.24, vs. n = 312, mean = 6.4, SD = 4.59; p < 0.001), and among those with caregiving responsibilities than in those without (n = 81, mean = 9.6, SD = 5.11, vs. n = 829, mean = 7.6, SD = 5.21; p = 0.002). Score was independently associated with Kessler-6 score (B = 0.33, β = 0.331, p < 0.001) and mediated the negative effects of childrearing/caregiving. The Perceived Home Management Hassles Scale demonstrated sufficient structural validity, internal consistency, and construct validity, including known-groups and convergent validity. Test-retest reliability and generalizability to general populations awaits further research.