<p>The 3-jet events produced from proton-proton collisions at center of mass energies <InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_11867_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="45" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\sqrt{s}=\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>13,&#xa0;13.6,&#xa0;14, 20, and 27 TeV were considered. These energies match those of the Large Hadron Collider, both present and maybe future energies, we require one jet to exist in the central pseudorapidity region <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_11867_Article_IEq2.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="76" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((|\eta | &lt; 2.0)\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and two jets in a forward (same hemisphere) region <InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_11867_Article_IEq3.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="76" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\((|\eta | &gt;2.0)\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>. We compare the predictions of PYTHIA, HERWIG++, and SHERPA, among other Monte Carlo Event Generators. We examine the distributions of the jets’ transverse momentum, jet multiplicity, azimuthal angle, and pseudorapidity. We also examine the distribution of azimuthal angle differences between the center jet and the forward dijet system. We compared PYTHIA8 predictions with CMS data at <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_11867_Article_IEq4.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="58" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\sqrt{s} = 7\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>TeV for dijet azimuthal angle differences (<InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_11867_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="28" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Delta \phi\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>). The cross section rises with <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_11867_Article_IEq5.gif" Format="GIF" Height="17" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="28" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Delta \phi\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> and peaks near <InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_11867_Article_IEq7.gif" Format="GIF" Height="10" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\pi\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>, reflecting momentum conservation in hard scattering. The relevant Rivet analysis code was used to obtain the results. Three event generators are examined in the study, and the results show both similarities and variations in their predictions. All three generators agree at low jet multiplicities. There are differences at greater multiplicities when the collision energies rise: HERWIG’s predictions rise while PYTHIA8’s fall in comparison to SHERPA. Other investigations show similar patterns, with generators agreeing in some regions (like central <InlineEquation ID="IEq8"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_11867_Article_IEq8.gif" Format="GIF" Height="12" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\eta\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> distributions) but diverging in others (like high/low <InlineEquation ID="IEq9"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_11867_Article_IEq8.gif" Format="GIF" Height="12" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="13" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\eta\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation> or high <InlineEquation ID="IEq10"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_11867_Article_IEq10.gif" Format="GIF" Height="19" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="52" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\Delta \phi _{dijet}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>). These differences are likely due to the underlying theoretical models used by each generator. The results obtained emphasize the significance of generator-specific tuning for precision QCD research and new physics investigations at existing and future colliders.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Study of trijet production in proton-proton collisions at different energies

  • M. A. Mahmoud,
  • M. Gamal,
  • S. El-Sharkawy,
  • N. N. Abd Allah,
  • K. Mohamed

摘要

The 3-jet events produced from proton-proton collisions at center of mass energies \(\sqrt{s}=\) 13, 13.6, 14, 20, and 27 TeV were considered. These energies match those of the Large Hadron Collider, both present and maybe future energies, we require one jet to exist in the central pseudorapidity region \((|\eta | < 2.0)\) and two jets in a forward (same hemisphere) region \((|\eta | >2.0)\) . We compare the predictions of PYTHIA, HERWIG++, and SHERPA, among other Monte Carlo Event Generators. We examine the distributions of the jets’ transverse momentum, jet multiplicity, azimuthal angle, and pseudorapidity. We also examine the distribution of azimuthal angle differences between the center jet and the forward dijet system. We compared PYTHIA8 predictions with CMS data at \(\sqrt{s} = 7\) TeV for dijet azimuthal angle differences ( \(\Delta \phi\) ). The cross section rises with \(\Delta \phi\) and peaks near \(\pi\) , reflecting momentum conservation in hard scattering. The relevant Rivet analysis code was used to obtain the results. Three event generators are examined in the study, and the results show both similarities and variations in their predictions. All three generators agree at low jet multiplicities. There are differences at greater multiplicities when the collision energies rise: HERWIG’s predictions rise while PYTHIA8’s fall in comparison to SHERPA. Other investigations show similar patterns, with generators agreeing in some regions (like central \(\eta\) distributions) but diverging in others (like high/low \(\eta\) or high \(\Delta \phi _{dijet}\) ). These differences are likely due to the underlying theoretical models used by each generator. The results obtained emphasize the significance of generator-specific tuning for precision QCD research and new physics investigations at existing and future colliders.