<p>Pectus excavatum or funnel chest is the most prevalent chest wall deformity. Surgical correction is the treatment of choice which is predominantly performed on children and adolescents, often with significant surgical complication rates. While correction is primarily pursued for aesthetic reasons, proponents argue that correction of the inward deformity alleviates compression of the heart, consequently enhancing cardiorespiratory fitness. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess whether surgical correction of pectus excavatum yields improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness, quantified as maximal oxygen uptake (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_8038_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\:\dot{\text{V}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>O<sub>2</sub>max). A search of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase was conducted for studies evaluating the changes in <InlineEquation ID="IEq2"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_8038_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\:\dot{\text{V}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>O<sub>2</sub>max/<InlineEquation ID="IEq3"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_8038_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\:\dot{\text{V}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>O<sub>2</sub>peak following surgical correction of pectus excavatum. Systematic qualitative evaluation of the included studies utilized the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Quantitative assessment of intervention effect sizes was executed using a random-effects model, supplemented by meta-regression. Among the 1,598 screened studies, 15 non-randomized studies were included. Systematic qualitative assessment revealed serious or critical risk of bias in all included studies. Quantitative assessment identified systematic errors in outcome measurements in several studies. Following surgical correction, we found no statistically or clinically significant improvement in <InlineEquation ID="IEq4"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_8038_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\:\dot{\text{V}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>O<sub>2</sub>max/<InlineEquation ID="IEq5"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_8038_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\:\dot{\text{V}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>O<sub>2</sub>peak. Our findings highlight a lack of high-quality studies in this field of research. Our analysis could not demonstrate any significant physiological impacts resulting from PE correction. Future studies should adopt randomized controlled trial designs and implement rigorous testing protocols for <InlineEquation ID="IEq6"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_8038_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\:\dot{\text{V}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>O<sub>2</sub>max/<InlineEquation ID="IEq7"> <InlineMediaObject> <ImageObject Color="BlackWhite" FileRef="41598_2025_8038_Article_IEq1.gif" Format="GIF" Height="18" Rendition="HTML" Resolution="72" Type="Linedraw" Width="14" /> </InlineMediaObject> <EquationSource Format="TEX">\(\:\dot{\text{V}}\)</EquationSource> </InlineEquation>O<sub>2</sub>peak. The outcome of this study should prompt a restrained and cautious approach in communicating enhancement of physiological effects arising from surgical correction of pectus excavatum.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Cardiorespiratory fitness after correction of pectus excavatum: a systematic review with meta-analysis

  • Ara S. Media,
  • Peter Juhl-Olsen,
  • Thomas Decker Christensen,
  • Niels Katballe,
  • Henrik Vad,
  • René Horsleben Petersen,
  • Henrik Wiggers,
  • Stefan Nygaard Hansen,
  • Jean Farup,
  • Kristian Overgaard,
  • Frank Vincenzo de Paoli

摘要

Pectus excavatum or funnel chest is the most prevalent chest wall deformity. Surgical correction is the treatment of choice which is predominantly performed on children and adolescents, often with significant surgical complication rates. While correction is primarily pursued for aesthetic reasons, proponents argue that correction of the inward deformity alleviates compression of the heart, consequently enhancing cardiorespiratory fitness. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to assess whether surgical correction of pectus excavatum yields improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness, quantified as maximal oxygen uptake ( \(\:\dot{\text{V}}\) O2max). A search of PubMed, Scopus, and Embase was conducted for studies evaluating the changes in \(\:\dot{\text{V}}\) O2max/ \(\:\dot{\text{V}}\) O2peak following surgical correction of pectus excavatum. Systematic qualitative evaluation of the included studies utilized the Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions tool. Quantitative assessment of intervention effect sizes was executed using a random-effects model, supplemented by meta-regression. Among the 1,598 screened studies, 15 non-randomized studies were included. Systematic qualitative assessment revealed serious or critical risk of bias in all included studies. Quantitative assessment identified systematic errors in outcome measurements in several studies. Following surgical correction, we found no statistically or clinically significant improvement in \(\:\dot{\text{V}}\) O2max/ \(\:\dot{\text{V}}\) O2peak. Our findings highlight a lack of high-quality studies in this field of research. Our analysis could not demonstrate any significant physiological impacts resulting from PE correction. Future studies should adopt randomized controlled trial designs and implement rigorous testing protocols for \(\:\dot{\text{V}}\) O2max/ \(\:\dot{\text{V}}\) O2peak. The outcome of this study should prompt a restrained and cautious approach in communicating enhancement of physiological effects arising from surgical correction of pectus excavatum.