Scholarlink

<p>Inter-instrument variations of liver stiffness measure (LSM) by transient elastography might be problematic in clinical practice. LSMs provided by 2 different systems were compared in outpatients with chronic liver disease (CLD). In 777 consecutive asymptomatic outpatients admitted at the Hepatology Unit of Pisa University Hospital the agreement of LSMs measured by FibroScan<sup>®</sup> (Echosens, France) and FT9000 (Hisky Medical, China) (LSM<sub>Fibroscan</sub>/LSM<sub>FT9000</sub>) was tested using Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analyses (BAA). Delta FT9000-FibroScan<sup>®</sup> LSM (LSM-D) variations were analysed according to clinic-pathologic characteristics. ALT/AST/GGT and platelets-counts/portal-vein-caliber/spleen-bipolar-diameter were used as proxies of necro-inflammatory and portal hypertension, respectively. LSM<sub>FT9000</sub> and LSM<sub>Fibroscan</sub> were highly correlated (<i>r</i> = 0.781, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001) overall, but agreement varied according to BMI (normal-weight <i>r</i> = 0.841, over-weight <i>r</i> = 0.747, obese <i>r</i> = 0.647, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). LSM showed a + 0.52&#xa0;kPa bias (<i>p</i> = 0.01) with − 11/12&#xa0;kPa as 95% Limit of agreement, with higher values measured by LSM<sub>FT9000</sub> below 10&#xa0;kPa and lower values above 20&#xa0;kPa. In bivariate analysis LSM-D correlated with LSM<sub>Fibroscan</sub> and AST (β = 0.002, <i>p</i> = 0.001 with significant interaction, <i>p</i> = 0.018) and was associated with spleen-bipolar-diameter (β = 0.033, <i>p</i> = 0.027) and platelets-count (β=-0.008, <i>p</i> = 0.018) with significant interaction with LSM<sub>Fibroscan</sub> (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.001). LSM<sub>Fibroscan</sub> and LSM<sub>FT9000</sub> are strongly correlated overall with optimal agreement around 10&#xa0;kPa but limited at ends of the dynamic range: LSM<sub>FT9000</sub> provides higher values below 10&#xa0;kPa whereas LSM<sub>Fibroscan</sub> higher values over 20&#xa0;kPa with different measures distribution. LSM discrepancies associate with anthropometric characteristics, necro-inflammatory activity and portal hypertension proxies. These findings suggest the need of systems specific cut-offs in clinical practice.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Comparison of two transient elastography (TE) systems for measuring liver stiffness in clinical practice

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年7月1日

查看全文
  • Simone Cappelli,
  • Antonio Salvati,
  • Giovanni Petralli,
  • Laura De Rosa,
  • Gabriele Ricco,
  • Piero Colombatto,
  • Barbara Coco,
  • Filippo Oliveri,
  • Francesco Faita,
  • Ferruccio Bonino,
  • Maurizia Rossana Brunetto

摘要

Inter-instrument variations of liver stiffness measure (LSM) by transient elastography might be problematic in clinical practice. LSMs provided by 2 different systems were compared in outpatients with chronic liver disease (CLD). In 777 consecutive asymptomatic outpatients admitted at the Hepatology Unit of Pisa University Hospital the agreement of LSMs measured by FibroScan® (Echosens, France) and FT9000 (Hisky Medical, China) (LSMFibroscan/LSMFT9000) was tested using Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman analyses (BAA). Delta FT9000-FibroScan® LSM (LSM-D) variations were analysed according to clinic-pathologic characteristics. ALT/AST/GGT and platelets-counts/portal-vein-caliber/spleen-bipolar-diameter were used as proxies of necro-inflammatory and portal hypertension, respectively. LSMFT9000 and LSMFibroscan were highly correlated (r = 0.781, p < 0.001) overall, but agreement varied according to BMI (normal-weight r = 0.841, over-weight r = 0.747, obese r = 0.647, p < 0.001). LSM showed a + 0.52 kPa bias (p = 0.01) with − 11/12 kPa as 95% Limit of agreement, with higher values measured by LSMFT9000 below 10 kPa and lower values above 20 kPa. In bivariate analysis LSM-D correlated with LSMFibroscan and AST (β = 0.002, p = 0.001 with significant interaction, p = 0.018) and was associated with spleen-bipolar-diameter (β = 0.033, p = 0.027) and platelets-count (β=-0.008, p = 0.018) with significant interaction with LSMFibroscan (p < 0.001). LSMFibroscan and LSMFT9000 are strongly correlated overall with optimal agreement around 10 kPa but limited at ends of the dynamic range: LSMFT9000 provides higher values below 10 kPa whereas LSMFibroscan higher values over 20 kPa with different measures distribution. LSM discrepancies associate with anthropometric characteristics, necro-inflammatory activity and portal hypertension proxies. These findings suggest the need of systems specific cut-offs in clinical practice.