Scholarlink

<p>This study aimed to compare two deep learning reconstruction (DLR) techniques (AiCE mild; AiCE strong) with two established methods—iterative reconstruction (IR) and filtered back projection (FBP)—for the detection of monosodium urate (MSU) in dual-energy computed tomography (DECT). An ex vivo bio-phantom and a raster phantom were prepared by inserting syringes containing different MSU concentrations and scanned in a 320-rows volume DECT scanner at different tube currents. The scans were reconstructed in a soft tissue kernel using the four reconstruction techniques mentioned above, followed by quantitative assessment of MSU volumes and image quality parameters, i.e., signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Both DLR techniques outperformed conventional IR and FBP in terms of volume detection and image quality. Notably, unlike IR and FBP, the two DLR methods showed no positive correlation of the MSU detection rate with the CT dose index (CTDIvol) in the bio-phantom. Our study highlights the potential of DLR for DECT imaging in gout, where it offers enhanced detection sensitivity, improved image contrast, reduced image noise, and lower radiation exposure. Further research is needed to assess the clinical reliability of this approach.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Deep learning reconstruction enhances tophus detection in a dual-energy CT phantom study

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年5月28日

查看全文
  • Sydney Alexandra Schmolke,
  • Torsten Diekhoff,
  • Jürgen Mews,
  • Karim Khayata,
  • Maximilian Kotlyarov

摘要

This study aimed to compare two deep learning reconstruction (DLR) techniques (AiCE mild; AiCE strong) with two established methods—iterative reconstruction (IR) and filtered back projection (FBP)—for the detection of monosodium urate (MSU) in dual-energy computed tomography (DECT). An ex vivo bio-phantom and a raster phantom were prepared by inserting syringes containing different MSU concentrations and scanned in a 320-rows volume DECT scanner at different tube currents. The scans were reconstructed in a soft tissue kernel using the four reconstruction techniques mentioned above, followed by quantitative assessment of MSU volumes and image quality parameters, i.e., signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). Both DLR techniques outperformed conventional IR and FBP in terms of volume detection and image quality. Notably, unlike IR and FBP, the two DLR methods showed no positive correlation of the MSU detection rate with the CT dose index (CTDIvol) in the bio-phantom. Our study highlights the potential of DLR for DECT imaging in gout, where it offers enhanced detection sensitivity, improved image contrast, reduced image noise, and lower radiation exposure. Further research is needed to assess the clinical reliability of this approach.