<p>Human activity recognition (HAR) provided several benefits to people without disabilities. Researchers have provided public HAR datasets and developed technologies based on these datasets. However, the activities of pedestrians with mobility disabilities have not been actively investigated because related datasets do not exist. In this study, we compile an HAR dataset comprising basic activities for people with and without mobility disabilities (including activity categories of still, walking, crutches, walkers, manual wheelchairs, and electric wheelchairs). Our dataset contains sensor data from smart devices (smartphones and smartwatches) collected from 120 participants. We also provide baseline analyses of our dataset: (1) recognition tasks according to the pedestrian activities, (2) impact of sensor combinations, (3) classification models, (4) evaluation methods, and (5) combining smartphone and smartwatch sensors. The results indicate that the classification accuracies are 99.64% for the random evaluation and 98.79% for the user-independent evaluation using the best combinations. We hope that this study will expand HAR research for people with mobility disabilities and renew enthusiasm for subsequent applications related to this topic.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Human Activity Recognition Dataset for Pedestrians with Mobility Disabilities

  • Yeji Woo,
  • Sungjin Hwang,
  • Seungwoo Oh,
  • Myungwon Kang,
  • Sungyoon Lee,
  • Jieun Kim,
  • Jaehyuk Cha,
  • Kwanguk Kenny Kim

摘要

Human activity recognition (HAR) provided several benefits to people without disabilities. Researchers have provided public HAR datasets and developed technologies based on these datasets. However, the activities of pedestrians with mobility disabilities have not been actively investigated because related datasets do not exist. In this study, we compile an HAR dataset comprising basic activities for people with and without mobility disabilities (including activity categories of still, walking, crutches, walkers, manual wheelchairs, and electric wheelchairs). Our dataset contains sensor data from smart devices (smartphones and smartwatches) collected from 120 participants. We also provide baseline analyses of our dataset: (1) recognition tasks according to the pedestrian activities, (2) impact of sensor combinations, (3) classification models, (4) evaluation methods, and (5) combining smartphone and smartwatch sensors. The results indicate that the classification accuracies are 99.64% for the random evaluation and 98.79% for the user-independent evaluation using the best combinations. We hope that this study will expand HAR research for people with mobility disabilities and renew enthusiasm for subsequent applications related to this topic.