<p>Although genomic sequencing presents groundbreaking newborn screening (NBS) opportunities, critical feasibility and utility questions remain. Here we present initial results from the Early Check program—an observational study assessing the feasibility and clinical utility of genomic NBS in North Carolina. Recruitment was statewide through mailed letters with electronic consent. Genome sequencing with analysis of 169 high actionability genes (plus 29 optional lower actionability genes) was performed using residual NBS dried blood spots. In 8 months, 1,979 newborns were screened, with 50 (2.5%) screen positives. Negative results were returned electronically, positive results by genetic counselors. Twenty-eight results (55%) were true positives, all received anticipatory guidance, surveillance and management recommendations, and referral to specialists as appropriate. We report technical feasibility and preliminary clinical utility finding, along with interpretation and follow-up challenges that hinder public health implementation. We propose standardized terminology to facilitate cross-study comparisons and accurate characterization of genomic NBS outcomes.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Feasibility and clinical utility of expanded genomic newborn screening in the Early Check program

  • Heidi L. Cope,
  • Elizabeth R. Jalazo,
  • Jonathan S. Berg,
  • Jennifer A. Sullivan,
  • Katerina S. Kucera,
  • Scott M. Shone,
  • Hannah E. Frawley,
  • Angela Y. Gwaltney,
  • Ana N. Forsythe,
  • Brooke A. Migliore,
  • Becca Wright,
  • Rebecca R. Moultrie,
  • Laura V. Milko,
  • Rebekah S. Zimmerman,
  • Paul Kruszka,
  • Sharon F. Suchy,
  • Amber Begtrup,
  • Katherine G. Langley,
  • Kristin G. Monaghan,
  • Christina Kraczkowski,
  • Adam J. Guenzel,
  • Kirsty McWalter,
  • Kathleen S. Hruska,
  • Donald B. Bailey Jr,
  • Anne C. Wheeler,
  • Melissa Raspa,
  • Cynthia M. Powell,
  • Holly L. Peay

摘要

Although genomic sequencing presents groundbreaking newborn screening (NBS) opportunities, critical feasibility and utility questions remain. Here we present initial results from the Early Check program—an observational study assessing the feasibility and clinical utility of genomic NBS in North Carolina. Recruitment was statewide through mailed letters with electronic consent. Genome sequencing with analysis of 169 high actionability genes (plus 29 optional lower actionability genes) was performed using residual NBS dried blood spots. In 8 months, 1,979 newborns were screened, with 50 (2.5%) screen positives. Negative results were returned electronically, positive results by genetic counselors. Twenty-eight results (55%) were true positives, all received anticipatory guidance, surveillance and management recommendations, and referral to specialists as appropriate. We report technical feasibility and preliminary clinical utility finding, along with interpretation and follow-up challenges that hinder public health implementation. We propose standardized terminology to facilitate cross-study comparisons and accurate characterization of genomic NBS outcomes.