<p>Human cancers are heterogeneous<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef></sup>. Dissecting how germline genetic variation and environmental factors shape tumour evolution using human datasets is limited by inherent diversity in genetic backgrounds<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR2">2</CitationRef></sup> and environmental exposures<sup><CitationRef AdditionalCitationIDS="CR4" CitationID="CR3">3</CitationRef>–<CitationRef CitationID="CR5">5</CitationRef></sup>. Here, to overcome these limitations, we re-ran early tumour evolution hundreds of times in diverged inbred mouse strains, generating matched histology and whole-genome and transcriptome sequences. The sex, environment and carcinogenic exposures were all controlled, and the study design allowed us to capture genetic variation comparable with that observed across human populations while exploiting the nested hierarchical structure of strain–litter–animal–tumour relationships. Our analyses reveal that epistatic interactions between genetic background and acquired somatic mutations result in population-specific disease progression, including choice of driver mutations, occurrence of whole-genome duplication and subclonal selection dynamics that mirror both cancer susceptibility and tumour growth rate. Even modest genetic divergence, comparable with that found across human ancestry groups, can strikingly&#xa0;alter selection pressures during cancer development to shape both cancer risk and the trajectory of tumour evolution.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Genetic background sets the trajectory of experimental cancer evolution

  • Sarah J. Aitken,
  • Frances Connor,
  • Christine Feig,
  • Tim F. Rayner,
  • Margus Lukk,
  • Juliet Luft,
  • Stuart Aitken,
  • Claudia Arnedo-Pac,
  • James F. Hayes,
  • Michael D. Nicholson,
  • Ailith Ewing,
  • Vasavi Sundaram,
  • Jan C. Verburg,
  • John Connelly,
  • Craig J. Anderson,
  • Mikaela Behm,
  • Susan Campbell,
  • Maëlle Daunesse,
  • Vera B. Kaiser,
  • Elissavet Kentepozidou,
  • Oriol Pich,
  • Aisling M. Redmond,
  • Javier Santoyo-Lopez,
  • Inés Sentís,
  • Lana Talmane,
  • Ruben M. Drews,
  • Paul A. Ginno,
  • Erika López-Arribillaga,
  • Paul Flicek,
  • Núria López-Bigas,
  • Colin A. Semple,
  • Martin S. Taylor,
  • Duncan T. Odom

摘要

Human cancers are heterogeneous1. Dissecting how germline genetic variation and environmental factors shape tumour evolution using human datasets is limited by inherent diversity in genetic backgrounds2 and environmental exposures35. Here, to overcome these limitations, we re-ran early tumour evolution hundreds of times in diverged inbred mouse strains, generating matched histology and whole-genome and transcriptome sequences. The sex, environment and carcinogenic exposures were all controlled, and the study design allowed us to capture genetic variation comparable with that observed across human populations while exploiting the nested hierarchical structure of strain–litter–animal–tumour relationships. Our analyses reveal that epistatic interactions between genetic background and acquired somatic mutations result in population-specific disease progression, including choice of driver mutations, occurrence of whole-genome duplication and subclonal selection dynamics that mirror both cancer susceptibility and tumour growth rate. Even modest genetic divergence, comparable with that found across human ancestry groups, can strikingly alter selection pressures during cancer development to shape both cancer risk and the trajectory of tumour evolution.