<p>Despite promising data showing that circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) dynamics during treatment can inform real-time tumour response and recurrence risk<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef></sup>, how best to translate these insights into actionable clinical decision-making remains unclear. Here we report results from the EP-STAR trial—a multi-centre, ctDNA-driven, risk-adapted, non-randomized phase II study (<a href="https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04072107">NCT04072107</a>; ClinicalTrials.gov) testing whether a risk-adaptive treatment (RAT) strategy guided by on-treatment ctDNA dynamics can meaningfully improve survival, using nasopharyngeal carcinoma as a model. Eligible patients were enrolled and began treatment with standard-of-care gemcitabine–cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy (GP-NAC; the P in this abbreviation stands for platinum)<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR2">2</CitationRef></sup>, followed by RAT or standard-of-care chemoradiotherapy guided by ctDNA clearance trajectory during GP-NAC. Protocol-eligible patients who did not receive RAT, drawn from a prospectively registered ctDNA biomarker cohort (<a href="https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03855020">NCT03855020</a>)<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR3">3</CitationRef></sup>, served as a non-randomized, contemporaneous no-RAT external cohort. The primary end-point was failure-free survival (FFS) in the RAT group. After a median follow-up of 47.3 months, the 3-year FFS was 89.1% (83.2–95.0%) in the RAT group (<i>n</i> = 110). Patients who received RAT showed significantly improved FFS (<i>P&#xa0;</i>= 0.003, log–rank test) compared with the no-RAT external cohort (hazard ratio = 0.41 [0.23–0.75]; <i>P</i> = 0.004, Cox regression model). The RAT strategy was well-tolerated with no treatment-related deaths. Collectively, these data show that a ctDNA-driven RAT paradigm could be a promising strategy to improve survival, challenging the conventional fixed-course, static treatment approach.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Risk-adaptive therapy guided by dynamic ctDNA in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

  • Jiawei Lv,
  • Dan-Xue Zheng,
  • Jin-Hui Liang,
  • Ning Zhang,
  • Zu-Lu Ye,
  • Xu-Dong Xu,
  • Melvin. L. K. Chua,
  • Lu-Lu Zhang,
  • Zi-Ming Du,
  • Zi-Chen Zhang,
  • Wen-Fei Li,
  • Ling-Long Tang,
  • Lei Chen,
  • Yan-Ping Mao,
  • Rui Guo,
  • Yu-Pei Chen,
  • Li Lin,
  • Yuan Zhang,
  • Xu Liu,
  • Cheng Xu,
  • Zhi-Xuan Li,
  • Ling-Xin Xu,
  • Pan-Yang Yang,
  • Kun Chen,
  • Deng Bin,
  • Tian-Sheng Gao,
  • Jian-Ye Yan,
  • Lu-Si Chen,
  • Shao Hui Huang,
  • Hong-Yun Zhao,
  • Shu-Bin Hong,
  • Yu-Sheng Jie,
  • Hui-Ling Huang,
  • Xu-Hua Tang,
  • Jing-Ping Yun,
  • Li-Zhi Liu,
  • Li Tian,
  • Hao-Jiang Li,
  • Ji-Bin Li,
  • Guan-Qun Zhou,
  • Jun Ma,
  • Ying Sun

摘要

Despite promising data showing that circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) dynamics during treatment can inform real-time tumour response and recurrence risk1, how best to translate these insights into actionable clinical decision-making remains unclear. Here we report results from the EP-STAR trial—a multi-centre, ctDNA-driven, risk-adapted, non-randomized phase II study (NCT04072107; ClinicalTrials.gov) testing whether a risk-adaptive treatment (RAT) strategy guided by on-treatment ctDNA dynamics can meaningfully improve survival, using nasopharyngeal carcinoma as a model. Eligible patients were enrolled and began treatment with standard-of-care gemcitabine–cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy (GP-NAC; the P in this abbreviation stands for platinum)2, followed by RAT or standard-of-care chemoradiotherapy guided by ctDNA clearance trajectory during GP-NAC. Protocol-eligible patients who did not receive RAT, drawn from a prospectively registered ctDNA biomarker cohort (NCT03855020)3, served as a non-randomized, contemporaneous no-RAT external cohort. The primary end-point was failure-free survival (FFS) in the RAT group. After a median follow-up of 47.3 months, the 3-year FFS was 89.1% (83.2–95.0%) in the RAT group (n = 110). Patients who received RAT showed significantly improved FFS (= 0.003, log–rank test) compared with the no-RAT external cohort (hazard ratio = 0.41 [0.23–0.75]; P = 0.004, Cox regression model). The RAT strategy was well-tolerated with no treatment-related deaths. Collectively, these data show that a ctDNA-driven RAT paradigm could be a promising strategy to improve survival, challenging the conventional fixed-course, static treatment approach.