<p>Oncogenes such as <i>KRAS</i> display marked tissue specificity in their oncogenic potential, genetic interactions and phenotypic effects, but the underlying determinants remain largely unresolved<sup><CitationRef AdditionalCitationIDS="CR2 CR3 CR4" CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef>–<CitationRef CitationID="CR5">5</CitationRef></sup>. Here, to address these questions, we developed the Mouse Cancer Cell line Atlas, a broad-utility resource of 590 comprehensively characterized models across a wide range of entities (<a href="http://www.mcca.tum.de">www.mcca.tum.de</a>). Comparative and functional studies using this platform, human cohorts and mice identified core principles underlying tissue-specific evolution of <i>KRAS</i>-initiated cancers. First, we show that mutant <i>KRAS</i> dosage gain through allelic imbalance exerts cell-type-specific effects, defining its timing across entities, as exemplified by dosage-sensitive developmental reprogramming during pancreatic cancer initiation. Second, we highlight how tissue- and stage-specific evolutionary requirements, such as block of differentiation in the intestine, select for <i>KRAS</i>-collaborating alterations. Third, we identified context-dependent epistatic <i>KRAS</i>–tumour&#xa0;suppressor interactions and show that reciprocal dosage sensitivities dictate the entity-specific patterns of cancer gene alterations, explaining their frequency, zygosity and acquisition chronology. These findings highlight how intrinsic and acquired determinants instruct cancer evolution in different tissues, with predictable molecular patterns, temporal dynamics and phenotypic outcomes. Our study provides major advances towards a mechanistic understanding of cancer genomes.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A disease model resource reveals core principles of tissue-specific cancer evolution

  • Sebastian Mueller,
  • Niklas de Andrade Krätzig,
  • Markus Tschurtschenthaler,
  • Miguel G. Silva,
  • Chiara Thordsen,
  • Riccardo Trozzo,
  • Perrine Simon,
  • Frederic Saab,
  • Thorsten Kaltenbacher,
  • Magdalena Zukowska,
  • Daniele Lucarelli,
  • Rupert Öllinger,
  • Joscha Griger,
  • Nina Groß,
  • Tanja Groll,
  • Jessica Löprich,
  • Antonio E. Zaurito,
  • Linus R. Schömig,
  • Jeroen M. Bugter,
  • Stefanie Bärthel,
  • Chiara Falcomatà,
  • Alexander Strong,
  • Cordelia Brandt,
  • Mulham Najajreh,
  • Aristeidis Papargyriou,
  • Roman Maresch,
  • Katharina A. N. Collins,
  • David Sailer,
  • Christian Schneeweis,
  • Sebastian Burger,
  • Lisa M. Fröhlich,
  • Christine Klement,
  • Alexander Belka,
  • Juan J. Montero,
  • Ute Jungwirth,
  • Maximilian Reichert,
  • Markus Moser,
  • Jens Neumann,
  • George Vassiliou,
  • Juan Cadiñanos,
  • Ignacio Varela,
  • Carsten Marr,
  • Daniel F. Alonso,
  • Pier-Luigi Lollini,
  • Jean Zhao,
  • Louis Chesler,
  • Clare M. Isacke,
  • Angela Riedel,
  • Christian J. Braun,
  • Martin L. Sos,
  • Filippo Beleggia,
  • Hans C. Reinhardt,
  • Monica Musteanu,
  • Mariano Barbacid,
  • Michael Quante,
  • Marc Schmidt-Supprian,
  • Günter Schneider,
  • Simon Clare,
  • Trevor D. Lawley,
  • Gordon Dougan,
  • Katja Steiger,
  • Nathalie Conte,
  • Allan Bradley,
  • Lena Rad,
  • Dieter Saur,
  • Roland Rad

摘要

Oncogenes such as KRAS display marked tissue specificity in their oncogenic potential, genetic interactions and phenotypic effects, but the underlying determinants remain largely unresolved15. Here, to address these questions, we developed the Mouse Cancer Cell line Atlas, a broad-utility resource of 590 comprehensively characterized models across a wide range of entities (www.mcca.tum.de). Comparative and functional studies using this platform, human cohorts and mice identified core principles underlying tissue-specific evolution of KRAS-initiated cancers. First, we show that mutant KRAS dosage gain through allelic imbalance exerts cell-type-specific effects, defining its timing across entities, as exemplified by dosage-sensitive developmental reprogramming during pancreatic cancer initiation. Second, we highlight how tissue- and stage-specific evolutionary requirements, such as block of differentiation in the intestine, select for KRAS-collaborating alterations. Third, we identified context-dependent epistatic KRAS–tumour suppressor interactions and show that reciprocal dosage sensitivities dictate the entity-specific patterns of cancer gene alterations, explaining their frequency, zygosity and acquisition chronology. These findings highlight how intrinsic and acquired determinants instruct cancer evolution in different tissues, with predictable molecular patterns, temporal dynamics and phenotypic outcomes. Our study provides major advances towards a mechanistic understanding of cancer genomes.