<p><i>Clostridioides difficile</i> infection (CDI) is the leading cause of healthcare- and antibiotic-associated infection and has a 30% recurrence rate<sup><CitationRef AdditionalCitationIDS="CR2 CR3 CR4" CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef>–<CitationRef CitationID="CR5">5</CitationRef></sup>. Previous vaccine strategies against CDI failed to reduce pathogen burden, a prerequisite for preventing <i>C. difficile</i> transmission and recurrence<sup><CitationRef AdditionalCitationIDS="CR7 CR8 CR9 CR10" CitationID="CR6">6</CitationRef>–<CitationRef CitationID="CR11">11</CitationRef></sup>. These vaccines were administered parenterally, which induced a systemic immune response, rather than a mucosal response in the colon, the site of infection. Here we compare protection and colonization burden between mucosal (rectal) and parenteral (intraperitoneal) administration routes of a multivalent, adjuvanted vaccine combining inactivated <i>C. difficile</i> toxins and novel surface antigens. We found that mucosal immunization, but not parenteral, clears <i>C. difficile</i> from the host. Unique correlates of decolonization included faecal IgG responses to vegetative surface antigens and a colonic, T helper type 17 (T<sub>H</sub>17)-skewed tissue-resident memory T cell response against spore antigen. Importantly, mucosal vaccination protected against morbidity, mortality, tissue damage and recurrence. Our results demarcate notable differences in correlates of protection and pathogen clearance between vaccine administration routes and highlight a mucosal immunization regimen that elicits sterilizing immunity against CDI.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Mucosal vaccination clears Clostridioides difficile colonization

  • Audrey K. Thomas,
  • F. Christopher Peritore-Galve,
  • Alyssa G. Ehni,
  • Bruno B. C. Lança,
  • Jonathan Coggin,
  • Eric J. Brady,
  • Sandra M. Yoder,
  • Rebecca Shrem,
  • Rubén Cano Rodríguez,
  • Heather K. Kroh,
  • Katherine N. Gibson-Corley,
  • M. Kay Washington,
  • Danyvid Olivares-Villagómez,
  • C. Buddy Creech,
  • Maribeth R. Nicholson,
  • Benjamin W. Spiller,
  • D. Borden Lacy

摘要

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is the leading cause of healthcare- and antibiotic-associated infection and has a 30% recurrence rate15. Previous vaccine strategies against CDI failed to reduce pathogen burden, a prerequisite for preventing C. difficile transmission and recurrence611. These vaccines were administered parenterally, which induced a systemic immune response, rather than a mucosal response in the colon, the site of infection. Here we compare protection and colonization burden between mucosal (rectal) and parenteral (intraperitoneal) administration routes of a multivalent, adjuvanted vaccine combining inactivated C. difficile toxins and novel surface antigens. We found that mucosal immunization, but not parenteral, clears C. difficile from the host. Unique correlates of decolonization included faecal IgG responses to vegetative surface antigens and a colonic, T helper type 17 (TH17)-skewed tissue-resident memory T cell response against spore antigen. Importantly, mucosal vaccination protected against morbidity, mortality, tissue damage and recurrence. Our results demarcate notable differences in correlates of protection and pathogen clearance between vaccine administration routes and highlight a mucosal immunization regimen that elicits sterilizing immunity against CDI.