<p>Maintaining biodiversity is central to the sustainable development agenda<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef></sup>. However, a lack of context-specific biodiversity information at policy-relevant scales has posed major limitations to decision-makers<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR2">2</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR3">3</CitationRef></sup>. To address this challenge, we undertook a comprehensive assessment of the biodiversity intactness of sub-Saharan Africa<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR4">4</CitationRef></sup> using place-based knowledge of 200 African biodiversity experts<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR5">5</CitationRef></sup>. We estimate that the region has on average lost 24% of its pre-colonial and pre-industrial faunal and floral population abundances, ranging from losses of &lt;20% for disturbance-adapted herbaceous plants to 80% for some large mammals. Rwanda and Nigeria are the least intact (&lt;55%), whereas Namibia and Botswana are the most intact (&gt;85%). Notably, most remaining organisms occur in unprotected, relatively untransformed rangelands and natural forests. Losses in biodiversity intactness in the worst-affected biomes are driven by land transformation into cropland in grasslands and fynbos (Mediterranean-type ecosystems), by non-agricultural degradation in forests and by a combination of the two drivers in savannas. This assessment provides decision-makers with multifaceted, contextually appropriate and policy-relevant information on the state of biodiversity in an understudied region of the world. Our approach could be used in other regions, including better-studied localities, to integrate contextual, place-based knowledge into multiscale assessments of biodiversity status and impacts.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

A place-based assessment of biodiversity intactness in sub-Saharan Africa

  • Hayley S. Clements,
  • Reinette Biggs,
  • Alta De Vos,
  • Emmanuel Do Linh San,
  • Gareth P. Hempson,
  • Birthe Linden,
  • Bryan Maritz,
  • Ara Monadjem,
  • Chevonne Reynolds,
  • Frances Siebert,
  • Nicola Stevens,
  • Matthew Child,
  • Enrico Di Minin,
  • Karen J. Esler,
  • Maike Hamann,
  • Ty Loft,
  • Belinda Reyers,
  • Odirilwe Selomane,
  • Geethen Singh,
  • Andrew L. Skowno

摘要

Maintaining biodiversity is central to the sustainable development agenda1. However, a lack of context-specific biodiversity information at policy-relevant scales has posed major limitations to decision-makers2,3. To address this challenge, we undertook a comprehensive assessment of the biodiversity intactness of sub-Saharan Africa4 using place-based knowledge of 200 African biodiversity experts5. We estimate that the region has on average lost 24% of its pre-colonial and pre-industrial faunal and floral population abundances, ranging from losses of <20% for disturbance-adapted herbaceous plants to 80% for some large mammals. Rwanda and Nigeria are the least intact (<55%), whereas Namibia and Botswana are the most intact (>85%). Notably, most remaining organisms occur in unprotected, relatively untransformed rangelands and natural forests. Losses in biodiversity intactness in the worst-affected biomes are driven by land transformation into cropland in grasslands and fynbos (Mediterranean-type ecosystems), by non-agricultural degradation in forests and by a combination of the two drivers in savannas. This assessment provides decision-makers with multifaceted, contextually appropriate and policy-relevant information on the state of biodiversity in an understudied region of the world. Our approach could be used in other regions, including better-studied localities, to integrate contextual, place-based knowledge into multiscale assessments of biodiversity status and impacts.