<p>It has long been proposed<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef></sup>, and then observed<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR2">2</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR3">3</CitationRef></sup>, that faster rates of soil production occur beneath thinner soils. It remains uncertain, however, whether soil thickness is the driving variable regulating production from the top-down<sup><CitationRef AdditionalCitationIDS="CR3 CR4 CR5" CitationID="CR2">2</CitationRef>–<CitationRef CitationID="CR6">6</CitationRef></sup>, or whether soil thickness is simply responding to changes in bedrock weathering controlled from the bottom-up<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR7">7</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR8">8</CitationRef></sup>. Answering this question is difficult because the feedbacks between soil production and soil erosion, the processes that jointly govern soil thickness<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR2">2</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR9">9</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR10">10</CitationRef></sup>, respond to perturbations on timescales of thousands to millions of years<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR11">11</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR12">12</CitationRef></sup>, timescales that are too long for scientists to observe directly. Here we leverage a space-for-time substitution at a transient mountain range along the San Andreas Fault<sup><CitationRef AdditionalCitationIDS="CR14" CitationID="CR13">13</CitationRef>–<CitationRef CitationID="CR15">15</CitationRef></sup>, where the remarkable tectonic setting allows for independent quantification of uplift, soil production and erosion. We show that, following a pulse of tectonic uplift, the conversion of rock to soil accelerates before the overlying soils thin, but at the same time that topographic stresses increase<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR7">7</CitationRef></sup> and the rock weakens<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR16">16</CitationRef></sup>. This observation challenges the long-standing assumption that soil production rates are controlled predominantly by soil thickness<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR2">2</CitationRef></sup>, and instead lends evidence for a bottom-up, rock strength control on soil production.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

The contribution of rock strength to soil production

  • Emily C. Geyman,
  • David A. Paige,
  • Michael P. Lamb

摘要

It has long been proposed1, and then observed2,3, that faster rates of soil production occur beneath thinner soils. It remains uncertain, however, whether soil thickness is the driving variable regulating production from the top-down26, or whether soil thickness is simply responding to changes in bedrock weathering controlled from the bottom-up7,8. Answering this question is difficult because the feedbacks between soil production and soil erosion, the processes that jointly govern soil thickness2,9,10, respond to perturbations on timescales of thousands to millions of years11,12, timescales that are too long for scientists to observe directly. Here we leverage a space-for-time substitution at a transient mountain range along the San Andreas Fault1315, where the remarkable tectonic setting allows for independent quantification of uplift, soil production and erosion. We show that, following a pulse of tectonic uplift, the conversion of rock to soil accelerates before the overlying soils thin, but at the same time that topographic stresses increase7 and the rock weakens16. This observation challenges the long-standing assumption that soil production rates are controlled predominantly by soil thickness1,2, and instead lends evidence for a bottom-up, rock strength control on soil production.