<p>The iron and steel sector is central to national net-zero efforts but remains hard to abate<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR2">2</CitationRef></sup>. Existing decarbonization roadmaps fail to guide technology choices for individual plants, given their heterogeneity and economic constraints<sup><CitationRef AdditionalCitationIDS="CR4" CitationID="CR3">3</CitationRef>–<CitationRef CitationID="CR5">5</CitationRef></sup>. Here, by integrating two global plant-level datasets and forecasted technology costs, we develop a model to identify the least-cost technology pathway for each plant worldwide in alignment with national carbon-neutrality targets. In the short term (pre-2030), energy efficiency improvements and scrap reuse are the cheapest decarbonization strategies, reducing cumulative global carbon dioxide (CO<sub>2</sub>) emissions by 7.8 Gt and 7.2 Gt at average costs of –US$8.5 tCO<sub>2</sub><sup>−1</sup> and US$0.3 tCO<sub>2</sub><sup>−1</sup>, respectively. In the long term (after 2030), smelt reduction with carbon capture is expected to become technically mature and economically viable, achieving approximately 6.0 Gt of CO<sub>2</sub> reductions at costs of US$7–15 tCO<sub>2</sub><sup>−1</sup> in Chinese plants and US$26–75 tCO<sub>2</sub><sup>−1</sup> in plants across Japan, Korea and Europe. After 2040, green-hydrogen-based steelmaking is estimated to contribute an additional 0.3 Gt of CO<sub>2</sub> abatement in European plants at costs of US$27–44 tCO<sub>2</sub><sup>−1</sup>. This study tailors plant-specific least-cost technology pathways that reconcile stakeholders’ economic interests with climate objectives, enabling actionable decarbonization strategies and supporting global net-zero targets.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Technological pathways for cost-effective steel decarbonization

  • Xinyi Wu,
  • Jing Meng,
  • Xi Liang,
  • Laixiang Sun,
  • D’Maris Coffman,
  • Andreas Kontoleon,
  • Dabo Guan

摘要

The iron and steel sector is central to national net-zero efforts but remains hard to abate1,2. Existing decarbonization roadmaps fail to guide technology choices for individual plants, given their heterogeneity and economic constraints35. Here, by integrating two global plant-level datasets and forecasted technology costs, we develop a model to identify the least-cost technology pathway for each plant worldwide in alignment with national carbon-neutrality targets. In the short term (pre-2030), energy efficiency improvements and scrap reuse are the cheapest decarbonization strategies, reducing cumulative global carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions by 7.8 Gt and 7.2 Gt at average costs of –US$8.5 tCO2−1 and US$0.3 tCO2−1, respectively. In the long term (after 2030), smelt reduction with carbon capture is expected to become technically mature and economically viable, achieving approximately 6.0 Gt of CO2 reductions at costs of US$7–15 tCO2−1 in Chinese plants and US$26–75 tCO2−1 in plants across Japan, Korea and Europe. After 2040, green-hydrogen-based steelmaking is estimated to contribute an additional 0.3 Gt of CO2 abatement in European plants at costs of US$27–44 tCO2−1. This study tailors plant-specific least-cost technology pathways that reconcile stakeholders’ economic interests with climate objectives, enabling actionable decarbonization strategies and supporting global net-zero targets.