<p>The exact nature of crustal magmatic reservoirs is elusive as they cannot be sampled in situ. The traditional view that magma chambers contain essentially molten material has recently been replaced by the transcrustal magmatic system (TCMS), in which reservoirs are mostly composed of immobile magmatic crystals with a minute fraction of more mobile melt<sup><CitationRef AdditionalCitationIDS="CR2" CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef>–<CitationRef CitationID="CR3">3</CitationRef></sup>, creating a ‘magmatic mush’<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR3">3</CitationRef></sup>. Eruptions are possible if a significant portion of melt segregates into melt-rich lenses within the mush reservoir<sup><CitationRef AdditionalCitationIDS="CR2" CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef>–<CitationRef CitationID="CR3">3</CitationRef></sup>. The TCMS concept is, however, a default model essentially justified by the absence of clear geophysical signatures of melt-rich magma chambers<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR4">4</CitationRef></sup>, and by the rare and tentative estimates of the melt fraction in the crustal storage zones based on geochemical and textural analysis of eruptive products<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR5">5</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR6">6</CitationRef></sup>. Here we image a bright electrical conductor at 23 ± 1 km below sea level beneath Mayotte island that we interpret as a magmatic reservoir, based on laboratory measurements of Mayotte’s melt conductivity. This large magmatic reservoir (more than 200 km<sup>3</sup>) contains a high melt fraction (22–42%). Such a crystal-to-liquid ratio matches the reconstructed differentiation paths<sup><CitationRef AdditionalCitationIDS="CR8" CitationID="CR7">7</CitationRef>–<CitationRef CitationID="CR9">9</CitationRef></sup> producing the melts that recently erupted at Mayotte. This reservoir is possibly connected to the system that fed the large submarine eruption of Fani Maoré in 2018–2019<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR10">10</CitationRef></sup>.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Magnetotelluric evidence for a melt-rich magmatic reservoir beneath Mayotte

  • Pierre Wawrzyniak,
  • Fabrice Gaillard,
  • Sophie Hautot,
  • Juan Andujar,
  • Pascal Tarits,
  • Laurent Arbaret,
  • Samuel Guegan,
  • David Sifré,
  • Jean-François D’Eu,
  • Jacques Deparis,
  • Anne Lemoine,
  • Isabelle Thinon,
  • Sheldon Warden,
  • Frédéric Dubois

摘要

The exact nature of crustal magmatic reservoirs is elusive as they cannot be sampled in situ. The traditional view that magma chambers contain essentially molten material has recently been replaced by the transcrustal magmatic system (TCMS), in which reservoirs are mostly composed of immobile magmatic crystals with a minute fraction of more mobile melt13, creating a ‘magmatic mush’3. Eruptions are possible if a significant portion of melt segregates into melt-rich lenses within the mush reservoir13. The TCMS concept is, however, a default model essentially justified by the absence of clear geophysical signatures of melt-rich magma chambers1,4, and by the rare and tentative estimates of the melt fraction in the crustal storage zones based on geochemical and textural analysis of eruptive products5,6. Here we image a bright electrical conductor at 23 ± 1 km below sea level beneath Mayotte island that we interpret as a magmatic reservoir, based on laboratory measurements of Mayotte’s melt conductivity. This large magmatic reservoir (more than 200 km3) contains a high melt fraction (22–42%). Such a crystal-to-liquid ratio matches the reconstructed differentiation paths79 producing the melts that recently erupted at Mayotte. This reservoir is possibly connected to the system that fed the large submarine eruption of Fani Maoré in 2018–201910.