<p>Frictional interfaces are found in systems ranging from biological joints to earthquake faults. When and how these interfaces slide is a fundamental problem in geosciences and engineering<sup><CitationRef AdditionalCitationIDS="CR2 CR3 CR4 CR5 CR6 CR7 CR8 CR9 CR10 CR11 CR12 CR13 CR14 CR15 CR16 CR17 CR18 CR19" CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef>–<CitationRef CitationID="CR20">20</CitationRef></sup>. It is believed that there exists a threshold shear force, called static friction, below which the interface is stationary<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR4">4</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR10">10</CitationRef></sup>, despite many studies suggesting that this concept is outdated<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef>,<CitationRef AdditionalCitationIDS="CR22 CR23 CR24 CR25 CR26 CR27" CitationID="CR21">21</CitationRef>–<CitationRef CitationID="CR28">28</CitationRef></sup>. By contrast, rate-and-state friction formulations<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR26">26</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR27">27</CitationRef></sup> predict that interfaces are always sliding<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR29">29</CitationRef></sup>, but this feature is often considered an artefact that calls for modifications<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR30">30</CitationRef></sup>. Here we show that nominally stationary interfaces subjected to constant shear and normal loads, with a driving force that is notably below the classically defined static friction for which creep is known to occur<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR9">9</CitationRef>,<CitationRef AdditionalCitationIDS="CR28" CitationID="CR27">27</CitationRef>–<CitationRef CitationID="CR29">29</CitationRef></sup>, are sliding, but with diminishingly small rates down to 10<sup>−12</sup> m s<sup>−1</sup>. Our precise measurements directly at the interface are enabled by digital image correlation<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR18">18</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR31">31</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR32">32</CitationRef></sup>. This behaviour contradicts classical models of friction but confirms the prediction of rate-and-state friction<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR26">26</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR27">27</CitationRef></sup>. The diminishing slip rates of nominally stationary interfaces reflect interface healing, which would manifest itself in higher peak friction in subsequent slip events<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR15">15</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR27">27</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR33">33</CitationRef></sup>, such as earthquakes and landslides, substantially modifying their nucleation and propagation and hence their hazard<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR3">3</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR12">12</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR13">13</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR34">34</CitationRef></sup>.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Sliding and healing of frictional interfaces that appear stationary

  • Krittanon Sirorattanakul,
  • Stacy Larochelle,
  • Vito Rubino,
  • Nadia Lapusta,
  • Ares J. Rosakis

摘要

Frictional interfaces are found in systems ranging from biological joints to earthquake faults. When and how these interfaces slide is a fundamental problem in geosciences and engineering120. It is believed that there exists a threshold shear force, called static friction, below which the interface is stationary4,10, despite many studies suggesting that this concept is outdated1,2128. By contrast, rate-and-state friction formulations1,26,27 predict that interfaces are always sliding29, but this feature is often considered an artefact that calls for modifications30. Here we show that nominally stationary interfaces subjected to constant shear and normal loads, with a driving force that is notably below the classically defined static friction for which creep is known to occur9,2729, are sliding, but with diminishingly small rates down to 10−12 m s−1. Our precise measurements directly at the interface are enabled by digital image correlation18,31,32. This behaviour contradicts classical models of friction but confirms the prediction of rate-and-state friction1,26,27. The diminishing slip rates of nominally stationary interfaces reflect interface healing, which would manifest itself in higher peak friction in subsequent slip events15,27,33, such as earthquakes and landslides, substantially modifying their nucleation and propagation and hence their hazard3,12,13,34.