<p>Inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) are genetic disorders that underlie susceptibility to infection, autoimmunity, autoinflammation, allergy and/or malignancy<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef></sup>. Incomplete penetrance is common among IEIs despite their monogenic basis<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR2">2</CitationRef></sup>. Here we investigate the contribution of autosomal random monoallelic expression (aRMAE), a somatic commitment to the expression of one allele<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR3">3</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR4">4</CitationRef></sup>, to phenotypic variability observed in families with IEIs. Using a clonal primary T cell system to assess aRMAE status of genes in healthy individuals, we find that 4.30% of IEI genes and 5.20% of all genes undergo aRMAE. Perturbing H3K27me3 and DNA methylation alters allele expression commitment, in support of two proposed mechanisms<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR5">5</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR6">6</CitationRef></sup> for the regulation of aRMAE. We tested peripheral blood mononuclear cells from individuals with IEIs with shared genetic lesions but discordant clinical phenotypes for aRMAE. Among two relatives who were heterozygous for a mutation in <i>PLCG2</i> (delEx19), an antibody deficiency phenotype corresponds to selective mutant allele expression in B cells. By contrast, among relatives who were heterozygous for a mutation in <i>JAK1</i> (c.2099G&gt;A; p.S700N), the unaffected carrier T cells predominantly expressed the wild-type <i>JAK1</i> allele, whereas the affected carrier T cells exhibited biallelic expression. Allelic expression bias was also documented in phenotypically discordant family members with mutations in <i>STAT1</i> and <i>CARD11</i>. This study highlights the importance of considering both the genotype and the ‘transcriptotype’ in analyses of the penetrance and expressivity of monogenic disorders.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Monoallelic expression can govern penetrance of inborn errors of immunity

  • O’Jay Stewart,
  • Conor Gruber,
  • Haley E. Randolph,
  • Roosheel Patel,
  • Meredith Ramba,
  • Enrica Calzoni,
  • Lei Haley Huang,
  • Jay Levy,
  • Sofija Buta,
  • Angelica Lee,
  • Christos Sazeides,
  • Zoe Prue,
  • David P. Hoytema van Konijnenburg,
  • Ivan K. Chinn,
  • Luis A. Pedroza,
  • James R. Lupski,
  • Erica G. Schmitt,
  • Megan A. Cooper,
  • Anne Puel,
  • Xiao Peng,
  • Stéphanie Boisson-Dupuis,
  • Jacinta Bustamante,
  • Satoshi Okada,
  • Marta Martin-Fernandez,
  • Jordan S. Orange,
  • Jean-Laurent Casanova,
  • Joshua D. Milner,
  • Dusan Bogunovic

摘要

Inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) are genetic disorders that underlie susceptibility to infection, autoimmunity, autoinflammation, allergy and/or malignancy1. Incomplete penetrance is common among IEIs despite their monogenic basis2. Here we investigate the contribution of autosomal random monoallelic expression (aRMAE), a somatic commitment to the expression of one allele3,4, to phenotypic variability observed in families with IEIs. Using a clonal primary T cell system to assess aRMAE status of genes in healthy individuals, we find that 4.30% of IEI genes and 5.20% of all genes undergo aRMAE. Perturbing H3K27me3 and DNA methylation alters allele expression commitment, in support of two proposed mechanisms5,6 for the regulation of aRMAE. We tested peripheral blood mononuclear cells from individuals with IEIs with shared genetic lesions but discordant clinical phenotypes for aRMAE. Among two relatives who were heterozygous for a mutation in PLCG2 (delEx19), an antibody deficiency phenotype corresponds to selective mutant allele expression in B cells. By contrast, among relatives who were heterozygous for a mutation in JAK1 (c.2099G>A; p.S700N), the unaffected carrier T cells predominantly expressed the wild-type JAK1 allele, whereas the affected carrier T cells exhibited biallelic expression. Allelic expression bias was also documented in phenotypically discordant family members with mutations in STAT1 and CARD11. This study highlights the importance of considering both the genotype and the ‘transcriptotype’ in analyses of the penetrance and expressivity of monogenic disorders.