Scholarlink

<p>Urolithiasis is increasingly common, with rising rates driven by obesity, diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Patients with cancer have additional, unique risks of stone formation owing to effects on fluid and electrolyte balance, systemic cancer therapies, tumour lysis syndrome and anatomical alterations after urinary diversion or nephrectomy. Moreover, urolithiasis itself has been linked to increased rates of renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma and bladder cancer, potentially mediated by chronic inflammation, recurrent infections and shared metabolic or environmental factors. Management in this setting is complex and must be individualized. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy achieves the highest stone-free rates in patients with altered urinary tract anatomy, whereas retrograde intrarenal surgery and shock wave lithotripsy have more selective roles. Preventive strategies focus on thorough metabolic evaluation, hydration optimization and addressing cancer-specific risk factors such as hypercalcaemia, acidosis and chronic urinary stasis. Despite these insights, data on the epidemiology, mechanistic underpinnings and optimal management of urolithiasis in patients with cancer remain limited. Prospective studies are needed to clarify causal relationships, refine preventive strategies and develop evidence-based treatment algorithms for this growing and complex population.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Urolithiasis in patients with cancer

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年6月22日

查看全文
  • Priya Dave,
  • Amy Yau,
  • A. Ari Hakimi,
  • Mantu Gupta,
  • William Atallah,
  • Alexander C. Small,
  • Kavita Gupta,
  • Douglas S. Scherr,
  • David S. Goldfarb,
  • Aisha Shaikh

摘要

Urolithiasis is increasingly common, with rising rates driven by obesity, diabetes and metabolic syndrome. Patients with cancer have additional, unique risks of stone formation owing to effects on fluid and electrolyte balance, systemic cancer therapies, tumour lysis syndrome and anatomical alterations after urinary diversion or nephrectomy. Moreover, urolithiasis itself has been linked to increased rates of renal cell carcinoma, urothelial carcinoma and bladder cancer, potentially mediated by chronic inflammation, recurrent infections and shared metabolic or environmental factors. Management in this setting is complex and must be individualized. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy achieves the highest stone-free rates in patients with altered urinary tract anatomy, whereas retrograde intrarenal surgery and shock wave lithotripsy have more selective roles. Preventive strategies focus on thorough metabolic evaluation, hydration optimization and addressing cancer-specific risk factors such as hypercalcaemia, acidosis and chronic urinary stasis. Despite these insights, data on the epidemiology, mechanistic underpinnings and optimal management of urolithiasis in patients with cancer remain limited. Prospective studies are needed to clarify causal relationships, refine preventive strategies and develop evidence-based treatment algorithms for this growing and complex population.