<p>Pesticide use and habitat loss are major anthropogenic drivers of bee decline, raising global concerns about impaired crop pollination. However, the relative importance of these stressors and their combined impact on bee assemblages comprising species with different traits, such as body size or nesting strategy, remains unknown. Here we addressed these key knowledge gaps in a global quantitative synthesis analysing bee assemblage data from 681 crop fields across three continents. We found that both local pesticide hazards and decreasing proportions of semi-natural habitats in surrounding landscapes negatively affected wild bee abundance and species richness in crop fields, while pesticides additionally reduced functional and phylogenetic diversity. Semi-natural habitat availability did not buffer against these negative pesticide effects, nor did we identify any specific traits rending bees more vulnerable to one of the two drivers. Our findings highlight the pressing need to reduce non-target effects of pesticide use and emphasize that conservation and restoration of semi-natural habitats successfully promote wild bees, but are insufficient strategies to mitigate pesticide-driven losses of wild bee pollinators from crop fields.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Pesticides and habitat loss additively reduce wild bees in crop fields

  • Anina Knauer,
  • Subodh Adhikari,
  • Georg K. S. Andersson,
  • Emilie Andrieu,
  • András Báldi,
  • Péter Batáry,
  • Jordi Bosch,
  • Sara L. Bushmann,
  • Domingo Cano,
  • Romain Carrié,
  • Bryan N. Danforth,
  • Francis A. Drummond,
  • Diane Esquerré,
  • Daniel García,
  • Claudio Gratton,
  • Peter A. Hambäck,
  • Anne-Kathrin Happe,
  • Veronica Hederström,
  • Andrea Holzschuh,
  • Philippe Jeanneret,
  • Riina Kaasik,
  • Temitope Kehinde,
  • Jessica Knapp,
  • Anikó Kovács-Hostyánszki,
  • Claire Kremen,
  • Ilona Leyer,
  • Gisela Lüscher,
  • Rachel Mallinger,
  • Riho Marja,
  • Carlos Martínez-Núñez,
  • Fabian D. Menalled,
  • Leithen K. M’Gonigle,
  • Marcos Miñarro,
  • Anne-Christine Mupepele,
  • Charlie C. Nicholson,
  • Mark Otieno,
  • Annie Ouin,
  • Mia G. Park,
  • Maria-Helena Pereira-Peixoto,
  • Antonio J. Pérez,
  • Simon G. Potts,
  • Annette Reineke,
  • Pedro J. Rey,
  • Taylor H. Ricketts,
  • Justine Rivers-Moore,
  • Stuart Roberts,
  • Laura Roquer-Beni,
  • Maj Rundlöf,
  • Ulrika Samnegård,
  • Michael J. Samways,
  • Janine M. Schwarz,
  • Oliver Schweiger,
  • Henrik G. Smith,
  • Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter,
  • Louis Sutter,
  • Giovanni Tamburini,
  • Deniz Uzman,
  • Eve Veromann,
  • Aude Vialatte,
  • Eneli Viik,
  • Mark J. F. Brown,
  • Alexandra-Maria Klein,
  • Matthias Albrecht

摘要

Pesticide use and habitat loss are major anthropogenic drivers of bee decline, raising global concerns about impaired crop pollination. However, the relative importance of these stressors and their combined impact on bee assemblages comprising species with different traits, such as body size or nesting strategy, remains unknown. Here we addressed these key knowledge gaps in a global quantitative synthesis analysing bee assemblage data from 681 crop fields across three continents. We found that both local pesticide hazards and decreasing proportions of semi-natural habitats in surrounding landscapes negatively affected wild bee abundance and species richness in crop fields, while pesticides additionally reduced functional and phylogenetic diversity. Semi-natural habitat availability did not buffer against these negative pesticide effects, nor did we identify any specific traits rending bees more vulnerable to one of the two drivers. Our findings highlight the pressing need to reduce non-target effects of pesticide use and emphasize that conservation and restoration of semi-natural habitats successfully promote wild bees, but are insufficient strategies to mitigate pesticide-driven losses of wild bee pollinators from crop fields.