Scholarlink

<p>One of the central goals of astrobiology is to test the hypothesis that extraterrestrial life exists. In practice, this means seeking imperfect proxies for life, or ‘biosignatures’. Experience shows that ambiguous and contestable results are common in this field. Many astrobiologists are highly attuned to the possibility of ‘false positive’ results that incorrectly indicate the discovery of life. But what if we fail to detect life that is (or was) actually present? Such ‘false negatives’ are bound to arise and they matter because they would represent failures to recognize past or present existence of life. Unlike false positives, false negatives are not currently high on research agendas, as they do not pose immediate risks. Here we identify multiple potential sources of false negatives in the search for life, including factors related to the abundance, activity, appearance and location of life; the preservation and detectability of its observable traces; and the limitations inherent in our detection methods. We call for the development of a deliberate research strategy that systematically addresses these risks. Identifying and constraining such sources is essential to reduce the likelihood of overlooking genuine evidence of life.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

False negatives in the search for extraterrestrial life

  • 期刊论文

  • 发表日期：

    2026年5月21日

查看全文
  • Inge Loes ten Kate,
  • Mickael Baqué,
  • Vinciane Debaille,
  • John Lee Grenfell,
  • Nozair Khawaja,
  • Fabian Klenner,
  • Yannick J. Lara,
  • Sean McMahon,
  • Christophe Malaterre,
  • Keavin Moore,
  • Lena Noack,
  • C. H. Lucas Patty,
  • Frank Postberg,
  • Emmanuelle J. Javaux

摘要

One of the central goals of astrobiology is to test the hypothesis that extraterrestrial life exists. In practice, this means seeking imperfect proxies for life, or ‘biosignatures’. Experience shows that ambiguous and contestable results are common in this field. Many astrobiologists are highly attuned to the possibility of ‘false positive’ results that incorrectly indicate the discovery of life. But what if we fail to detect life that is (or was) actually present? Such ‘false negatives’ are bound to arise and they matter because they would represent failures to recognize past or present existence of life. Unlike false positives, false negatives are not currently high on research agendas, as they do not pose immediate risks. Here we identify multiple potential sources of false negatives in the search for life, including factors related to the abundance, activity, appearance and location of life; the preservation and detectability of its observable traces; and the limitations inherent in our detection methods. We call for the development of a deliberate research strategy that systematically addresses these risks. Identifying and constraining such sources is essential to reduce the likelihood of overlooking genuine evidence of life.