Scholarlink

<p>Recent studies from China and India, none designed to assess vegan status, reported unusually large vegan samples (<i>n</i> = ~1000–8000) and prevalences (~1–9%). These were mostly inferred from short food frequency modules or short-term dietary assessment (e.g., 1 month). Many inferred vegans were socioeconomically marginalized or socially excluded. This perspective argues that the reported prevalences largely result from underassessment of intake and misclassification rather than adherence to vegan diets.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Inferred vegans in studies not designed to assess vegan status may be largely artifacts

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2026年7月21日

查看全文
  • Christian Koeder,
  • Maximilian Andreas Storz

摘要

Recent studies from China and India, none designed to assess vegan status, reported unusually large vegan samples (n = ~1000–8000) and prevalences (~1–9%). These were mostly inferred from short food frequency modules or short-term dietary assessment (e.g., 1 month). Many inferred vegans were socioeconomically marginalized or socially excluded. This perspective argues that the reported prevalences largely result from underassessment of intake and misclassification rather than adherence to vegan diets.