<p>Authenticating specialty tea products remains a critical challenge in premium food markets, yet current analytical approaches are constrained by limited reproducibility and susceptibility to instrumental variation. Here, we present a deep learning framework that transforms liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) metabolomic data into image representations, enabling robust authentication of tea products under real-world analytical conditions. Profiling 274 Tieguanyin tea samples across seasonal harvests (spring and autumn) and processing methods (light-scented and strong-scented), our approach achieved 90.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 80.4%–96.0%) classification accuracy—substantially outperforming conventional multivariate and machine learning methods (sPLS-DA: 85.5%; random forest: 87.3%). Critically, when subjected to chromatographic drift—a pervasive source of analytical irreproducibility—our model maintained 78.2% accuracy while traditional methods degraded to 69.1%. This framework addresses fundamental limitations in untargeted metabolomics, offering a generalizable solution for food authentication that extends beyond tea to broader applications in agricultural product verification and systems biology.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Deep learning enable precision authentication of seasonal and processing signatures in tieguanyin tea

  • Chao Zheng,
  • Xiaohe Zhou,
  • Ningning Shao,
  • Jiayi Cheng,
  • Wei Xin,
  • Ying Liu,
  • Junling Zhou

摘要

Authenticating specialty tea products remains a critical challenge in premium food markets, yet current analytical approaches are constrained by limited reproducibility and susceptibility to instrumental variation. Here, we present a deep learning framework that transforms liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) metabolomic data into image representations, enabling robust authentication of tea products under real-world analytical conditions. Profiling 274 Tieguanyin tea samples across seasonal harvests (spring and autumn) and processing methods (light-scented and strong-scented), our approach achieved 90.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 80.4%–96.0%) classification accuracy—substantially outperforming conventional multivariate and machine learning methods (sPLS-DA: 85.5%; random forest: 87.3%). Critically, when subjected to chromatographic drift—a pervasive source of analytical irreproducibility—our model maintained 78.2% accuracy while traditional methods degraded to 69.1%. This framework addresses fundamental limitations in untargeted metabolomics, offering a generalizable solution for food authentication that extends beyond tea to broader applications in agricultural product verification and systems biology.