<p>Elevated CO<sub>2</sub> (eCO<sub>2</sub>) frequently stimulates plant growth and is widely assumed to enhance productivity in multispecies communities<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR2">2</CitationRef></sup>, yet species responses to eCO<sub>2</sub> vary widely with biotic and abiotic context<sup><CitationRef CitationID="CR1">1</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR3">3</CitationRef>,<CitationRef CitationID="CR4">4</CitationRef></sup>. Whether eCO<sub>2</sub> relaxes competition or amplifies existing competitive hierarchies, shaping how growth benefits are distributed among species, remains poorly resolved. Here we synthesize data from 19 CO<sub>2</sub> enrichment experiments (glasshouse, chamber and field studies), encompassing 97 plant species from grass-dominated ecosystems to quantify how competitive context alters species- and mixture-level responses. Although most species respond positively to eCO<sub>2</sub> without neighbours, over half show neutral or negative responses in mixtures. Despite this, dominant species often drive modest increases in total mixture biomass under eCO<sub>2</sub>. Trait analyses indicate that acquisitive strategies, rather than intrinsic CO<sub>2</sub> sensitivity alone, predict success under competition. Together, our results indicate that under competition, eCO<sub>2</sub> redistributes growth benefits unevenly among species, favouring dominant species while many subdominants experience neutral or negative responses.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Interspecific competition negates CO2 benefits for most plant species

  • S. L. Raubenheimer,
  • K. J. Simpson,
  • B. S. Ripley,
  • C. P. Osborne,
  • P. B. Reich

摘要

Elevated CO2 (eCO2) frequently stimulates plant growth and is widely assumed to enhance productivity in multispecies communities1,2, yet species responses to eCO2 vary widely with biotic and abiotic context1,3,4. Whether eCO2 relaxes competition or amplifies existing competitive hierarchies, shaping how growth benefits are distributed among species, remains poorly resolved. Here we synthesize data from 19 CO2 enrichment experiments (glasshouse, chamber and field studies), encompassing 97 plant species from grass-dominated ecosystems to quantify how competitive context alters species- and mixture-level responses. Although most species respond positively to eCO2 without neighbours, over half show neutral or negative responses in mixtures. Despite this, dominant species often drive modest increases in total mixture biomass under eCO2. Trait analyses indicate that acquisitive strategies, rather than intrinsic CO2 sensitivity alone, predict success under competition. Together, our results indicate that under competition, eCO2 redistributes growth benefits unevenly among species, favouring dominant species while many subdominants experience neutral or negative responses.