<p>The subduction organic carbon (OC) flux is closely linked with seafloor sedimentation processes. In hadal trenches, sediment transport and resuspension caused by turbidity events provide rapid feedback of subducting carbon fate to seafloor sedimentation dynamics. Here we demonstrate that sediment sorting creates distinct OC burial patterns in the Japan Trench: Prolonged seafloor residence enables preferential removal of labile OC components and result in a refractory subsurface OC pool. Conversely, rapid sediment burial shortens seafloor residence time and promotes subsurface anaerobic OC degradation. We further suggest that these mechanisms result in at least 37.6% loss of the OC subduction flux in accretionary margins due to early diagenetic and thermal alteration processes, while erosive margins only loss 11% during subduction and preferentially transfer thermally stable OC into subduction zones. Our work bridges surficial depositional regimes and deep carbon transfer, highlighting the need to consider depositional settings when refining subduction zone carbon budgets.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Sediment-modulated seafloor residence time controls efficient organic carbon burial in subduction zones

  • Mengfan Chu,
  • Kejian Liu,
  • Zhirong Cai,
  • Troy Rasbury,
  • Martin Kölling,
  • Matthias Zabel,
  • Cecilia McHugh,
  • Michael Strasser,
  • Ken Ikehara,
  • Rui Bao

摘要

The subduction organic carbon (OC) flux is closely linked with seafloor sedimentation processes. In hadal trenches, sediment transport and resuspension caused by turbidity events provide rapid feedback of subducting carbon fate to seafloor sedimentation dynamics. Here we demonstrate that sediment sorting creates distinct OC burial patterns in the Japan Trench: Prolonged seafloor residence enables preferential removal of labile OC components and result in a refractory subsurface OC pool. Conversely, rapid sediment burial shortens seafloor residence time and promotes subsurface anaerobic OC degradation. We further suggest that these mechanisms result in at least 37.6% loss of the OC subduction flux in accretionary margins due to early diagenetic and thermal alteration processes, while erosive margins only loss 11% during subduction and preferentially transfer thermally stable OC into subduction zones. Our work bridges surficial depositional regimes and deep carbon transfer, highlighting the need to consider depositional settings when refining subduction zone carbon budgets.