Scholarlink

<p>No study has systematically compared the suitability of DNA methylation (DNAme) profiles in non-invasive samples for the detection of breast cancer (BC). We assess non-tumour DNAme in 1,100 cervical, buccal, and blood samples from BC cases and controls and find that cervical samples exhibit the largest nuber of differentially methylated sites, followed by buccal samples. No sites were significant in blood after FDR adjustment. Deriving DNAme-based classifiers for BC detection in each sample type (WID-buccal-, cervical-, or blood-BC), we achieve validation AUCs of 0.75, 0.66, and 0.51, respectively. Buccal and cervical BC-associated DNAme alterations distinguish between BC cases and controls in both surrogate and breast tissue (AUC &gt; 0.88), yet individual sites and the directionality of methylation changes are not identical between these two sample types, and buccal sample DNAme aligns with breast methylation changes more closely. Pending additional validation, these insights may have the potential to improve non-invasive personalized BC prevention.</p>

错误：搜索内容不能为空，请输入英文关键词
错误：关键词超出字数限制，请精简
高级检索

Systems epigenetic approach towards non-invasive breast cancer detection

  • 期刊论文

  • 出版模式：

    开放获取

  • 发表日期：

    2025年4月2日

查看全文
  • Chiara M. S. Herzog,
  • Bente Theeuwes,
  • Allison Jones,
  • Iona Evans,
  • Line Bjørge,
  • Michal Zikan,
  • David Cibula,
  • Nadia Harbeck,
  • Nicoletta Colombo,
  • Nora Pashayan,
  • Martin Widschwendter

摘要

No study has systematically compared the suitability of DNA methylation (DNAme) profiles in non-invasive samples for the detection of breast cancer (BC). We assess non-tumour DNAme in 1,100 cervical, buccal, and blood samples from BC cases and controls and find that cervical samples exhibit the largest nuber of differentially methylated sites, followed by buccal samples. No sites were significant in blood after FDR adjustment. Deriving DNAme-based classifiers for BC detection in each sample type (WID-buccal-, cervical-, or blood-BC), we achieve validation AUCs of 0.75, 0.66, and 0.51, respectively. Buccal and cervical BC-associated DNAme alterations distinguish between BC cases and controls in both surrogate and breast tissue (AUC > 0.88), yet individual sites and the directionality of methylation changes are not identical between these two sample types, and buccal sample DNAme aligns with breast methylation changes more closely. Pending additional validation, these insights may have the potential to improve non-invasive personalized BC prevention.