Background <p>We aimed to identify patient and tumour characteristics associated with differential benefit from minimally invasive lobectomy (MIL) or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).</p> Methods <p>Patients with clinical stage I NSCLC (TNM7), treated with MIL or SABR in 2014-2016, were included in this retrospective cohort study. Propensity score (PS) weighting was used to create a virtual SABR cohort with characteristics comparable to the MIL group. We assessed interactions between treatment type and clinical characteristics affecting overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).</p> Results <p>1211 MIL and 972 SABR patients were included. After PS weighting, the impact of treatment type on OS differed significantly between patients with prior myocardial infarction or heart failure (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.82; favouring MIL) versus patients without (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.70-1.67) (p = 0.02). Moreover, MIL yielded superior OS in patients with both FEV<sub>1</sub> and DLCO ≥ 80% (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.30-1.26), while SABR favoured patients with FEV<sub>1</sub> and/or DLCO &lt; 80% (HR 1.50, 95% CI 0.95-2.36) (p = 0.04).</p> Conclusions <p>Interactions of treatment type with lung function and with prior myocardial infarction or heart failure impacted OS for patients with stage I NSCLC. These findings warrant validation in other studies to further refine treatment decision-making.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Stage I non-small cell lung cancer: improving patient selection for minimally invasive lobectomy or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy based on clinical characteristics

  • Julianne Cynthia de Ruiter,
  • Vincent van der Noort,
  • Judi Nani Annet van Diessen,
  • Egbert Frederik Smit,
  • Ronald Alphons Maria Damhuis,
  • Koen Johan Hartemink,
  • M. I. Amir,
  • H. van Berkum,
  • H. Bertens,
  • M. Bindels,
  • E. M. Bongers,
  • R. C. Boshuizen,
  • K. de Brake-de Jong,
  • J. Braun,
  • F. J. C. van den Broek,
  • J. Bussink,
  • S. Canisius,
  • R. A. M. Damhuis,
  • M. Deelen,
  • J. P. Deroose,
  • C. Dickhoff,
  • M. F. H. Dielwart,
  • J. N. A. van Diessen,
  • M. Dubbelman-Siems,
  • K. van Elst,
  • M. Ghamati,
  • F. A. B. Grimme,
  • M. A. de Groot,
  • F. R. Halfwerk,
  • K. J. Hartemink,
  • P. Hellebrekers,
  • L. E. L. Hendriks,
  • E. R. Hendriks,
  • S. van Heukelem,
  • A. ten Heuvel,
  • N. Hugen,
  • M. Hutteman,
  • M. Hüyük,
  • W. M. IJgosse,
  • K. de Jaeger,
  • E. M. de Jong,
  • D. van Kampen,
  • S. de Keersmaecker,
  • H. M. Klomp,
  • E. A. Kouwenhoven,
  • F. H. Krouwels,
  • E. Lammers,
  • W. B. Lastdrager,
  • K. van der Leest,
  • K. R. Liesker,
  • E. R. de Loos,
  • A. De Lorenzo,
  • A. P. W. M. Maat,
  • J. G. Maessen,
  • R. Mali,
  • N. Marquenie,
  • G. M. H. Marres,
  • B. G. Martina,
  • I. Masselink,
  • R. C. A. Meijer,
  • D. M. Mens,
  • E. M. von Meyenfeldt,
  • S. Michel,
  • L. B. van Middendorp,
  • A. Moons-Pasic,
  • L. Morsink,
  • J. G. H. van Nes,
  • M. van Nistelrooy,
  • V. van der Noort,
  • J. J. M. E. Nuyttens,
  • J. W. A. Oosterhuis,
  • L. W. J. Oosthoek,
  • E. Osté,
  • C. Overhof-Wedick,
  • H. W. Palamba,
  • G. F. Paulus,
  • J. W. G. van Putten,
  • S. E. van Putten,
  • H. Rijna,
  • C. Rikers,
  • J. C. de Ruiter,
  • D. K. de Ruysscher,
  • M. Schiefer,
  • D. Schweitzer,
  • N. Smakman,
  • E. F. Smit,
  • W. G. J. M. Smit,
  • L. N. Spaans,
  • R. G. H. Speekenbrink,
  • M. Stellingwerf,
  • A. J. Steward,
  • D. Susa,
  • E. van Thiel,
  • N. M. Thönissen,
  • E. J. Veen,
  • A. A. F. A. Veenhof,
  • A. van Velthoven-Hoogers,
  • N. P. A. Verbogt,
  • L. Verbruggen,
  • A. F. T. M. Verhagen,
  • J. J. C. Verhoeff,
  • N. C. M. G. van der Voort van Zyp,
  • C. van de Wauwer,
  • E. M. de Wee,
  • A. J. van der Wekken,
  • R. R. Wener,
  • R. Wijsman,
  • F. J. H. van den Wildenberg,
  • L. van der Woude,
  • Z. L. Yang

摘要

Background

We aimed to identify patient and tumour characteristics associated with differential benefit from minimally invasive lobectomy (MIL) or stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

Patients with clinical stage I NSCLC (TNM7), treated with MIL or SABR in 2014-2016, were included in this retrospective cohort study. Propensity score (PS) weighting was used to create a virtual SABR cohort with characteristics comparable to the MIL group. We assessed interactions between treatment type and clinical characteristics affecting overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Results

1211 MIL and 972 SABR patients were included. After PS weighting, the impact of treatment type on OS differed significantly between patients with prior myocardial infarction or heart failure (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32-0.82; favouring MIL) versus patients without (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.70-1.67) (p = 0.02). Moreover, MIL yielded superior OS in patients with both FEV1 and DLCO ≥ 80% (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.30-1.26), while SABR favoured patients with FEV1 and/or DLCO < 80% (HR 1.50, 95% CI 0.95-2.36) (p = 0.04).

Conclusions

Interactions of treatment type with lung function and with prior myocardial infarction or heart failure impacted OS for patients with stage I NSCLC. These findings warrant validation in other studies to further refine treatment decision-making.