错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Circulating tumour DNA and risk of recurrence in patients with asymptomatic versus symptomatic colorectal cancer

  • Nadia Øgaard,
  • Sarah Østrup Jensen,
  • Mai-Britt Worm Ørntoft,
  • Christina Demuth,
  • Mads Heilskov Rasmussen,
  • Tenna Vesterman Henriksen,
  • Jesper Nors,
  • Amanda Frydendahl,
  • Iben Lyskjær,
  • Marijana Nesic,
  • Christina Therkildsen,
  • Jakob Kleif,
  • Mikail Gögenur,
  • Lars Nannestad Jørgensen,
  • Jesper Vilandt,
  • Jakob Benedict Seidelin,
  • Kåre Anderson Gotschalck,
  • Claudia Jaensch,
  • Berit Andersen,
  • Uffe Schou Løve,
  • Ole Thorlacius-Ussing,
  • Per Vadgaard Andersen,
  • Thomas Kolbro,
  • Alessio Monti,
  • Jeppe Kildsig,
  • Peter Bondeven,
  • Nis Hallundbæk Schlesinger,
  • Lene Hjerrild Iversen,
  • Morten Rasmussen,
  • Ismail Gögenur,
  • Jesper Bertram Bramsen,
  • Claus Lindbjerg Andersen

摘要

Background

Multiple initiatives aim to develop circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) tests for early cancer detection in asymptomatic individuals. The few studies describing ctDNA-testing in both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients report lower ctDNA detection in the asymptomatic patients. Here, we explore if asymptomatic patients differ from symptomatic patients e.g. by including a ‘low-ctDNA-shedding’ and ‘less-aggressive’ subgroup.

Methods

ctDNA assessment was performed in two independent cohorts of consecutively recruited patients with asymptomatic colorectal cancer (CRC) (Cohort#1: n = 215, Cohort#2: n = 368) and symptomatic CRC (Cohort#1: n = 117, Cohort#2: n = 722).

Results

After adjusting for tumour stage and size, the odds of ctDNA detection was significantly lower in asymptomatic patients compared to symptomatic patients (Cohort#1: OR: 0.4, 95%CI: 0.2–0.8, Cohort#2: OR: 0.7, 95%CI: 0.5–0.9). Further, the recurrence risk was lower in asymptomatic patients (Cohort#1: sHR: 0.6, 95%CI: 0.3–1.2, Cohort#2: sHR: 0.6, 95%CI: 0.4–1.0). Notably, ctDNA-negative asymptomatic patients had the lowest recurrence risk compared to the symptomatic patients (Cohort#1: sHR: 0.2, 95%CI: 0.1–0.6, Cohort#2: sHR: 0.3, 95%CI: 0.2–0.6).

Conclusions

Our study suggests that asymptomatic patients are enriched for a ‘low-ctDNA-shedding-low-recurrence-risk’ subgroup. Such insights are needed to guide ctDNA-based early-detection initiatives and should prompt discussions about de-escalation of therapy and follow-up for ctDNA-negative asymptomatic CRC patients.