<p>Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is still recommended as a standard treatment of choice for relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Regarding the second allo-HCT (allo-HCT2), variable comorbid conditions and leukemic evolution after previous allo-HCT may affect poor survival outcomes. With the introduction of newer immunotherapeutic agents including blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, and ponatinib, we got more chances for allo-HCT2 expecting more promising transplantation outcomes. We analyzed 78 adult patients with post-HCT relapsed B-ALL undergoing allo-HCT2. Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative B-ALL (<i>n</i> = 45) treated with nower agents showed improved survival outcomes compared to conventional chemotherapy (median survival 29.6 vs. 6.8 months, <i>p</i> = 0.018), which was primarily driven by lower 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (37.9% vs. 68.8%, <i>p</i> = 0.037). In contrast, no survival advantage of allo-HCT2 was observed in Ph-positive B-ALL (<i>n</i> = 33) with a median survival of 16.0 months across the salvage regimens. Our findings highlighted the efficacy of newer salvage therapies in Ph-negative B-ALL, while underscores the need for alternative strategies for Ph-positive ALL. Overall, relapses after allo-HCT2 are still challenging which emphasize the need for strategies other than allo-HCT3 including newer agents such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T/NK therapies or post-transplant minimal residual disease targeted therapies.</p>

错误:搜索内容不能为空,请输入英文关键词
错误:关键词超出字数限制,请精简
高级检索

Outcome of second allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in adult patients with relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in the era of new immunotherapeutic agents

  • Daehun Kwag,
  • Jae-Ho Yoon,
  • Gi June Min,
  • Sung-Soo Park,
  • Silvia Park,
  • Sung-Eun Lee,
  • Byung-Sik Cho,
  • Ki-Seong Eom,
  • Yoo-Jin Kim,
  • Hee-Je Kim,
  • Chang-Ki Min,
  • Seok-Goo Cho,
  • Seok Lee

摘要

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) is still recommended as a standard treatment of choice for relapsed B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Regarding the second allo-HCT (allo-HCT2), variable comorbid conditions and leukemic evolution after previous allo-HCT may affect poor survival outcomes. With the introduction of newer immunotherapeutic agents including blinatumomab, inotuzumab ozogamicin, and ponatinib, we got more chances for allo-HCT2 expecting more promising transplantation outcomes. We analyzed 78 adult patients with post-HCT relapsed B-ALL undergoing allo-HCT2. Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)-negative B-ALL (n = 45) treated with nower agents showed improved survival outcomes compared to conventional chemotherapy (median survival 29.6 vs. 6.8 months, p = 0.018), which was primarily driven by lower 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse (37.9% vs. 68.8%, p = 0.037). In contrast, no survival advantage of allo-HCT2 was observed in Ph-positive B-ALL (n = 33) with a median survival of 16.0 months across the salvage regimens. Our findings highlighted the efficacy of newer salvage therapies in Ph-negative B-ALL, while underscores the need for alternative strategies for Ph-positive ALL. Overall, relapses after allo-HCT2 are still challenging which emphasize the need for strategies other than allo-HCT3 including newer agents such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T/NK therapies or post-transplant minimal residual disease targeted therapies.