<p>Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising intervention for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), yet clinical outcomes remain inconsistent. To investigate the neural mechanisms underlying therapeutic variability, we conducted a patient-specific finite element (FE) modeling study of electric fields (EF) induced by tDCS in OCD patients. Forty-two patients from a double-blind, randomized clinical trial received active tDCS with the cathode over the pre-supplementary motor area and the anode over the right supraorbital region. Clinical response was assessed using the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), and responders were defined as those achieving ≥35% score reduction. Individual head models were created using SimNIBS, and current density directionality (<InlineEquation ID="IEq1"><EquationSource Format="TEX">${J}_{n}$</EquationSource><EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math><msub><mrow><mi>J</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow></msub></math></EquationSource></InlineEquation>) and magnitude (<InlineEquation ID="IEq2"><EquationSource Format="TEX">${J}_{{magn}}$</EquationSource><EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math><msub><mrow><mi>J</mi></mrow><mrow><mi mathvariant="italic">magn</mi></mrow></msub></math></EquationSource></InlineEquation>) were analyzed. Voxel-wise comparisons revealed significantly greater depolarization (<InlineEquation ID="IEq3"><EquationSource Format="TEX">${J}_{n}\,$</EquationSource><EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math><mrow><msub><mrow><mi>J</mi></mrow><mrow><mi>n</mi></mrow></msub><mspace width="0.5em" /></mrow></math></EquationSource></InlineEquation>> 0) in the left anterior prefrontal cortex (BA10) and right frontal eye field (BA 8) associated with a reduction of Y-BOCS. A link between hyperpolarization of right pars orbitalis (BA47) and improvement in symptoms was also found. Notably, no significant findings emerged using EF magnitude (<InlineEquation ID="IEq4"><EquationSource Format="TEX">${J}_{{magn}}$</EquationSource><EquationSource Format="MATHML"><math><msub><mrow><mi>J</mi></mrow><mrow><mi mathvariant="italic">magn</mi></mrow></msub></math></EquationSource></InlineEquation>), underscoring the relevance of current directionality in treatment response. To our knowledge, this is the first study to associate directional EF modeling with clinical outcomes in OCD. Our findings highlight the importance of considering both EF direction and anatomical variability when optimizing tDCS protocols. This approach may contribute to more personalized and effective neuromodulation strategies for psychiatric disorders.</p>

Linking electric field directionality to treatment outcome in OCD: Insights from patient-specific tDCS modeling

期刊论文
出版模式：

开放获取
发表日期：

2026年6月22日

查看全文

Julie Gosez,
Arnaud Germaneau,
Karim El Houari,
Prasanth Bokam,
Michel Rochette,
Nicolas Langbour,
Rémy Guillevin,
Nemat Jaafari,
Ghina Harika-Germaneau

摘要

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a promising intervention for treatment-resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), yet clinical outcomes remain inconsistent. To investigate the neural mechanisms underlying therapeutic variability, we conducted a patient-specific finite element (FE) modeling study of electric fields (EF) induced by tDCS in OCD patients. Forty-two patients from a double-blind, randomized clinical trial received active tDCS with the cathode over the pre-supplementary motor area and the anode over the right supraorbital region. Clinical response was assessed using the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS), and responders were defined as those achieving ≥35% score reduction. Individual head models were created using SimNIBS, and current density directionality (${J}_{n}$ $J_{n}$ ) and magnitude (${J}_{{magn}}$ $J_{magn}$ ) were analyzed. Voxel-wise comparisons revealed significantly greater depolarization (${J}_{n}\,$ $J_{n}$ > 0) in the left anterior prefrontal cortex (BA10) and right frontal eye field (BA 8) associated with a reduction of Y-BOCS. A link between hyperpolarization of right pars orbitalis (BA47) and improvement in symptoms was also found. Notably, no significant findings emerged using EF magnitude (${J}_{{magn}}$ $J_{magn}$ ), underscoring the relevance of current directionality in treatment response. To our knowledge, this is the first study to associate directional EF modeling with clinical outcomes in OCD. Our findings highlight the importance of considering both EF direction and anatomical variability when optimizing tDCS protocols. This approach may contribute to more personalized and effective neuromodulation strategies for psychiatric disorders.